Return to Answer

By default, no, that's not allowed. Under Linux (from man 2 kill):

The only signals that can be sent to process ID 1, the init process, are those for which init has explicitly installed signal handlers. This is done to assure the system is not brought down accidentally.

Pid 1 (init) can decide to allow itself to be killed, in which case the "kill" is basically a request for it to shut itself down. This is one possible way to implement the halt command, though I'm not aware of any init that does that.

On a Mac, killing launchd (its init analogue) with signal 15 (SIGTERM) will immediately reboot the system, without bothering to shut down running programs cleanly. Killing it with the uncatchable signal 9 (SIGKILL) does nothing, showing that Mac's kill() semantics are the same as Linux's in this respect.

At the moment, I don't have a Linux box handy that I'm willing to experiment with, so the question of what Linux's init does with a SIGTERM will have to wait. And with init replacement projects like Upstart and Systemd being popular these days, the answer could be variable.

UPDATE: On Linux, init explicitly ignores SIGTERM, so it does nothing. @jsbillings has information on what Upstart and Systemd do.

By default, no, that's not allowed. Under Linux (from man 2 kill):

The only signals that can be sent to process ID 1, the init process, are those for which init has explicitly installed signal handlers. This is done to assure the system is not brought down accidentally.

Pid 1 (init) can decide to allow itself to be killed, in which case the "kill" is basically a request for it to shut itself down. This is one possible way to implement the halt command, though I'm not aware of any init that does that.

On a Mac, killing launchd (its init analogue) with signal 15 (SIGTERM) will immediately reboot the system, without bothering to shut down running programs cleanly. Killing it with the uncatchable signal 9 (SIGKILL) does nothing, showing that Mac's kill() semantics are the same as Linux's in this respect.

At the moment, I don't have a Linux box handy that I'm willing to experiment with, so the question of what Linux's init does with a SIGTERM will have to wait. And with init replacement projects like Upstart and Systemd being popular these days, the answer could be variable.

UPDATE: On Linux, init explicitly ignores SIGTERM, so it does nothing. @jsbillings has information on what Upstart and Systemd do.

By default, no, that's not allowed. Under Linux (from man 2 kill):

The only signals that can be sent to process ID 1, the init process, are those for which init has explicitly installed signal handlers. This is done to assure the system is not brought down accidentally.

Pid 1 (init) can decide to allow itself to be killed, in which case the "kill" is basically a request for it to shut itself down. This is one possible way to implement the halt command, though I'm not aware of any init that does that.

On a Mac, killing launchd (its init analogue) with signal 15 (SIGTERM) will immediately reboot the system, without bothering to shut down running programs cleanly. Killing it with the uncatchable signal 9 (SIGKILL) does nothing, showing that Mac's kill() semantics are the same as Linux's in this respect.

At the moment, I don't have a Linux box handy that I'm willing to experiment with, so the question of what Linux's init does with a SIGTERM will have to wait. And with init replacement projects like Upstart and Systemd being popular these days, the answer could be variable.

UPDATE: On Linux, init explicitly ignores SIGTERM, so it does nothing. @jsbillings has information on what Upstart and Systemd do.

By default, no, that's not allowed. Under Linux (from man 2 kill):

The only signals that can be sent to process ID 1, the init process, are those for which init has explicitly installed signal handlers. This is done to assure the system is not brought down accidentally.

Pid 1 (init) can decide to allow itself to be killed, in which case the "kill" is basically a request for it to shut itself down. This is one possible way to implement the halt command, though I'm not aware of any init that does that.

On a Mac, killing launchd (its init analogue) with signal 15 (SIGTERM) will immediately reboot the system, without bothering to shut down running programs cleanly. Killing it with the uncatchable signal 9 (SIGKILL) does nothing, showing that Mac's kill() semantics are the same as Linux's in this respect.

At the moment, I don't have a Linux box handy that I'm willing to experiment with, so the question of what Linux's init does with a SIGTERM will have to wait. And with init replacement projects like Upstart and Systemd being popular these days, the answer could be variable.

UPDATE: On Linux, init explicitly ignores SIGTERM, so it does nothing. @jsbillings has information on what Upstart and Systemd do.

By default, no, that's not allowed. Under Linux (from man 2 kill):

The only signals that can be sent to process ID 1, the init process, are those for which init has explicitly installed signal handlers. This is done to assure the system is not brought down accidentally.

Pid 1 (init) can decide to allow itself to be killed, in which case the "kill" is basically a request for it to shut itself down. This is one possible way to implement the halt command.

On a Mac, killing launchd (its init analogue) with signal 15 (SIGTERM) will immediately reboot the system, without bothering to shut down running programs cleanly. Killing it with the uncatchable signal 9 (SIGKILL) does nothing, showing that Mac's kill() semantics are the same as Linux's in this respect.

At the moment, I don't have a Linux box handy that I'm willing to experiment with, so the question of what Linux's init does with a SIGTERM will have to wait. And with init replacement projects like Upstart and Systemd being popular these days, the answer could be variable.

By default, no, that's not allowed. Under Linux (from man 2 kill):

The only signals that can be sent to process ID 1, the init process, are those for which init has explicitly installed signal handlers. This is done to assure the system is not brought down accidentally.

Pid 1 (init) can decide to allow itself to be killed, in which case the "kill" is basically a request for it to shut itself down. This is one possible way to implement the halt command, though I'm not aware of any init that does that.

On a Mac, killing launchd (its init analogue) with signal 15 (SIGTERM) will immediately reboot the system, without bothering to shut down running programs cleanly. Killing it with the uncatchable signal 9 (SIGKILL) does nothing, showing that Mac's kill() semantics are the same as Linux's in this respect.

At the moment, I don't have a Linux box handy that I'm willing to experiment with, so the question of what Linux's init does with a SIGTERM will have to wait. And with init replacement projects like Upstart and Systemd being popular these days, the answer could be variable.

UPDATE: On Linux, init explicitly ignores SIGTERM, so it does nothing. @jsbillings has information on what Upstart and Systemd do.