Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Visit Stack Exchange
Stack Internal
Knowledge at work
Bring the best of human thought and AI automation together at your work.
Explore Stack InternaliI've got aan arm-based (arm_v8-64, ubuntu20.04)target target machine and aan amd-based host machine (x86_64, ubuntu20.04), since.
Since the cpu is much more powerful on the host than on the target, iI wonder couldwhether cross compilecompiling could be faster than native compilecompiling natively? iI mean based on a true-cross-compile envenvironment (like copy all the arm-libs and use corresponding toolchains, not by emulators like QEMU).
i got a arm-based (arm_v8-64, ubuntu20.04)target machine and a amd-based host machine(x86_64, ubuntu20.04), since the cpu is much more powerful on host than target, i wonder could cross compile faster than native compile? i mean based on a true-cross-compile env (like copy all the arm-libs and use corresponding toolchains, not by emulators like QEMU).
I've got an arm-based (arm_v8-64, ubuntu20.04) target machine and an amd-based host machine (x86_64, ubuntu20.04).
Since the cpu is much more powerful on the host than on the target, I wonder whether cross compiling could be faster than compiling natively? I mean based on a true-cross-compile environment (like copy all the arm-libs and use corresponding toolchains, not by emulators like QEMU).
i got a arm-based (arm_v8-64, ubuntu20.04)target machine and a amd-based host machine(x86_64, ubuntu20.04), since the cpu is much more powerful on host than target, i wonder could cross compile faster than native compile? i mean based on a true-cross-compile env (like copy all the arm-libs and use corresponding toolchains, not by emulators like QEMU).
