Private Markets are the New High-Growth Public Markets
By David George
When I got into growth investing, tech companies were a niche asset class in both the public and private markets. Today, technology has eaten everything, technology companies are the fastest growing among any sector, and the fastest growth in technology has stayed mostly behind the private‑market curtain. Private tech companies valued above $1B (~1,300 companies) now represent roughly $4.7T in aggregate value—about ~15% of the entire Nasdaq market cap, and closer to ~40% if you exclude the Magnificent 7. The Mag 7 in the public markets get the attention they deserve, but in the private markets over the last 10 years, the value of these private tech companies has grown almost 10x. By count, there are ~6x more private unicorns than public companies with a $1B+ market cap. In other words, there’s an enormous investable universe that public‑only investors don’t see.
The composition of the public markets is affected by this trend. Across public software, internet, and fintech, there are fewer than 5 companies expected to grow at over 30% in 2026. Whereas in just the last year, we’ve seen over 100 series B or later rounds for companies growing well in excess of 30%. We estimate that OpenAI and Anthropic alone are adding almost half as much new revenue this year as all of the public SaaS universe, excluding the Mag 7.
And it’s not just AI. SpaceX, Anduril, and Palantir (albeit public) are now adding billions of net-new revenue every year while the large defense primes grow at low-to-mid single digits. Obviously, as a growth-stage investor, I was excited to see these stats. But I think it’s also important for investors to 1) understand how drastically the composition of the public and private markets has changed, and 2) recognize that today, the top decile of high-growth companies are almost exclusively in the private markets.
In addition to the current crop of private companies staying private for longer, the cohort of IPOs of the last 5 years demonstrate that the majority of the value creation has happened in the private markets. Companies used to go public much earlier in their growth journey and generate tremendous equity value once public. The median company in the crop of 2014–2019 IPOs, for example, generated 80%+ of their market capitalization after becoming public companies. The more recent cohort, however, went public after already capturing a higher portion of their market opportunity in the private markets. Combined with the fact that they IPO’d at valuations that appropriately reflected their long-term potential—and with the caveat that they’ve been public for a shorter amount of time—these companies generated over 50% of their market capitalization when they were private.
Why has this happened? There’s enough private capital and adequate capital solutions for the best companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, xAI, Databricks, Stripe, Anduril, and Revolut in the private markets, so it’s no surprise the median company IPO’ing now does so 14 years after founding, versus 5 years after founding 20 years ago. There are a ton of benefits to going public—like gaining easier access to liquidity, more liquid compensation for employees and new hires, better positioning your company for M&A, extending ownership to your community, and more—but companies can also obviously stay private longer.
Tech has added ~$25–30T in market cap over the last 10 years and ~$10T excluding the Mag 7. The next decade of value creation will likely come from 2015–2025 vintage companies—most of which are still private today. I think AI is going to widen the gap even further… but more on that front soon.
Thank you to my partner Santiago Rodriguez Lebrija for contributions to this piece.
More from the a16z Growth Compendium
Recommended by LinkedIn
Why Winners Win
It’s no secret that every new platform shift ushers in a new set of winners. These new winners take advantage of both new technology infrastructure and new business models to far outpace financial models and consensus expectations. We call this breed of winners modelbusters.
We’re talking about modelbusters now because we’re going to see many, many more of these companies in the AI era. AI is the biggest platform shift of our lives, and we’re excited because it will create new ways of spending time as consumers, new ways of working, and new business models. The bigger the shift in UIs, amount of data accessed, and business models, the more the tech shifts favors the newcomer over the incumbent.
Connect with a16z Growth
Want to stay informed on the latest from a16z Growth? Subscribe here to receive these LinkedIn newsletters regularly.
And if you’re interested in in-depth theses, frameworks, benchmarking, and tactics for finding and growing best-in-class businesses straight from the a16z Growth investing and operating teams, check out our new Substack here.
Disclosures
You are receiving this newsletter since you opted in earlier; if you would like to opt out of future newsletters, you can unsubscribe immediately.
This newsletter is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be relied upon as legal, business, investment, or tax advice. You should consult your own advisers as to those matters. This newsletter may link to other websites and certain information contained herein has been obtained from third-party sources. While taken from sources believed to be reliable, a16z has not independently verified such information and makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation.
References to any companies, securities, or digital assets are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Furthermore, this content is not directed at nor intended for use by any investors or prospective investors, and may not under any circumstances be relied upon when making a decision to invest in any fund managed by a16z. (An offering to invest in an a16z fund will be made only by the private placement memorandum, subscription agreement, and other relevant documentation of any such fund which should be read in their entirety.) Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Content in this newsletter speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others. Please see disclosures for additional important information.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/mysorecity_omnichannel-digital-physical-activity-7366446151287402498-ufr2?utm_source=social_share_video_v2&utm_medium=android_app&rcm=ACoAAAMDNdAB5tKZfHBcyH1ULnFtOZzmoHlthDQ&utm_campaign=copy_link
The center of gravity has shifted innovation now compounds in private hands long before public markets ever see it
To me there are two outcomes to solve for - seemingly mutually exclusive. 1) How to expand access to private markets in a way that attempts to prevent widening the gap between the ultra-wealthy and the remaining 99.9+% of us. That gap leads to a bad societal outcome. 2) How to do this in a way that doesn't destroy the value prop for companies which remain privately held. Will the upcoming 401k rule changes help? Are there other vehicles? I realize I can get an answer with a little research or by asking ChatGPT, but I thought that asking experts on this thread would be a better idea than an answer generated by a $40B (?) privately held concern. :-)
great article! super relevant and much needed information right now.
Everyone’s debating liquidity, but here’s the bigger shift: staying private longer means innovation cycles now get dictated by private boards, not public markets. That concentrates power in fewer hands - and raises the question: are we accelerating breakthroughs or just delaying accountability?