The biggest limitation in today’s AI agents is not their fluency. It is memory. Most LLM-based systems forget what happened in the last session, cannot improve over time, and fail to reason across multiple steps. This makes them unreliable in real workflows. They respond well in the moment but do not build lasting context, retain task history, or learn from repeated use. A recent paper, “Rethinking Memory in AI,” introduces four categories of memory, each tied to specific operations AI agents need to perform reliably: 𝗟𝗼𝗻𝗴-𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗺 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆 focuses on building persistent knowledge. This includes consolidation of recent interactions into summaries, indexing for efficient access, updating older content when facts change, and forgetting irrelevant or outdated data. These operations allow agents to evolve with users, retain institutional knowledge, and maintain coherence across long timelines. 𝗟𝗼𝗻𝗴-𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝘅𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆 refers to techniques that help models manage large context windows during inference. These include pruning attention key-value caches, selecting which past tokens to retain, and compressing history so that models can focus on what matters. These strategies are essential for agents handling extended documents or multi-turn dialogues. 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗰 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 addresses how knowledge inside a model’s weights can be edited, updated, or removed. This includes fine-grained editing methods, adapter tuning, meta-learning, and unlearning. In continual learning, agents must integrate new knowledge without forgetting old capabilities. These capabilities allow models to adapt quickly without full retraining or versioning. 𝗠𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶-𝘀𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆 focuses on how agents coordinate knowledge across formats and systems. It includes reasoning over multiple documents, merging structured and unstructured data, and aligning information across modalities like text and images. This is especially relevant in enterprise settings, where context is fragmented across tools and sources. Looking ahead, the future of memory in AI will focus on: • 𝗦𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼-𝘁𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆: Agents will track when and where information was learned to reason more accurately and manage relevance over time. • 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆: Parametric (in-model) and non-parametric (external) memory will be integrated, allowing agents to fluidly switch between what they “know” and what they retrieve. • 𝗟𝗶𝗳𝗲𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴: Agents will be expected to learn continuously from interaction without retraining, while avoiding catastrophic forgetting. • 𝗠𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶-𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆: In environments with multiple agents, memory will need to be sharable, consistent, and dynamically synchronized across agents. Memory is not just infrastructure. It defines how your agents reason, adapt, and persist!
How Memory Innovation Drives AI Advancements
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Memory innovation is revolutionizing artificial intelligence (AI) by enabling systems to retain and utilize long-term knowledge, much like humans. This advancement empowers AI agents to maintain context across sessions, reason over time, and continuously adapt to new information, making them more reliable and insightful collaborators.
- Start with structured memory: Design AI systems with distinct short-term for session coherence and long-term memory for sustained personalization and task history.
- Focus on memory efficiency: Implement mechanisms like summarization and selective recall to manage large volumes of data without compromising system speed or accuracy.
- Enable continuous learning: Incorporate memory architectures that support the dynamic updating of knowledge and allow AI to adapt over time without requiring full retraining.
-
-
This is the only guide you need on AI Agent Memory 1. Stop Building Stateless Agents Like It's 2022 → Architect memory into your system from day one, not as an afterthought → Treating every input independently is a recipe for mediocre user experiences → Your agents need persistent context to compete in enterprise environments 2. Ditch the "More Data = Better Performance" Fallacy → Focus on retrieval precision, not storage volume → Implement intelligent filtering to surface only relevant historical context → Quality of memory beats quantity every single time 3. Implement Dual Memory Architecture or Fall Behind → Design separate short-term (session-scoped) and long-term (persistent) memory systems → Short-term handles conversation flow, long-term drives personalization → Single memory approach is amateur hour and will break at scale 4. Master the Three Memory Types or Stay Mediocre → Semantic memory for objective facts and user preferences → Episodic memory for tracking past actions and outcomes → Procedural memory for behavioral patterns and interaction styles 5. Build Memory Freshness Into Your Core Architecture → Implement automatic pruning of stale conversation history → Create summarization pipelines to compress long interactions → Design expiry mechanisms for time-sensitive information 6. Use RAG Principles But Think Beyond Knowledge Retrieval → Apply embedding-based search for memory recall → Structure memory with metadata and tagging systems → Remember: RAG answers questions, memory enables coherent behavior 7. Solve Real Problems Before Adding Memory Complexity → Define exactly what business problem memory will solve → Avoid the temptation to add memory because it's trendy → Problem-first architecture beats feature-first every time 8. Design for Context Length Constraints From Day One → Balance conversation depth with token limits → Implement intelligent context window management → Cost optimization matters more than perfect recall 9. Choose Storage Architecture Based on Retrieval Patterns → Vector databases for semantic similarity search → Traditional databases for structured fact storage → Graph databases for relationship-heavy memory types 10. Test Memory Systems Under Real-World Conversation Loads → Simulate multi-session user interactions during development → Measure retrieval latency under concurrent user loads → Memory that works in demos but fails in production is worthless Let me know if you've any questions 👋
-
RAG isn’t enough. Agents need memory. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) grounds AI in external knowledge but it treats every interaction like the first. Autonomous agents need more than search; they need experience. That’s where memory comes in. Short-term memory keeps context across a session. Long-term memory retains learnings across tasks, users, and time. Memory-augmented agents can reason, reflect, and adapt...not just retrieve. When agents can remember, they stop being assistants and start becoming collaborators. We’re seeing early signs: Big LLM providers are adding memory such like chatgpt memory or Google's recent memory announcement. LangChain and others are adding memory into pipelines ReAct-style prompting shows how reasoning depends on recall Vector stores are evolving into dynamic memory systems The future isn’t just RAG. It’s RAG + memory + reasoning.
-
😵 Woah, there’s a full-blown paper on how you could build a memory OS for LLMs. Memory in AI systems has only started getting serious attention recently, mainly because people realized that LLM context lengths are limited and passing everything every time for complex tasks just doesn’t scale. This is a forward-looking paper that treats memory as a first-class citizen, almost like an operating system layer for LLMs. It’s a long and dense read, but here are some highlights: ⛳ The authors define three types of memory in AI systems: - Parametric: Knowledge baked into the model weights - Activation: Temporary, runtime memory (like KV cache) - Plaintext: External editable memory (docs, notes, examples) The idea is to orchestrate and evolve these memory types together, not treat them as isolated hacks. ⛳ MemOS introduces a unified system to manage memory: representation, organization, access, and governance. ⛳ At the heart of it is MemCube, a core abstraction that enables tracking, fusion, versioning, and migration of memory across tasks. It makes memory reusable and traceable, even across agents. The vision here isn't just "memory", it’s to let agents adapt over time, personalize responses, and coordinate memory across platforms and workflows. I definitely think memory is one of the biggest blockers to building more human-like agents. This looks super well thought out, it gives you an abstraction to actually build with. Not totally sure if the same abstractions will work across all use cases, but very excited to see more work in this direction! Link: https://lnkd.in/gtxC7kXj
-
1/ Google Research unveils new paper: "Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Time" It introduces human-like memory structures to overcome the limits of Transformers, with one "SURPRISING" feature. Here's why this is huge for AI. 🧵👇 2/ The Problem: Transformers, the backbone of most AI today, struggle with long-term memory due to quadratic memory complexity. Basically, there's a big penalty for long context windows! Titans aims to solve this with massive scalability. 3/ What Makes Titans Different? Inspired by human memory, Titans integrate: • Short-term memory (real-time processing) • Long-term memory (retaining key past information) • Persistent memory (task-specific baked-in knowledge) This modular approach mimics how the brain works. 4/ Game-Changer: Memory at Test Time Titans can learn and adapt during inference (test time), unlike Transformers, which rely on pre-training. This means: • Dynamic updating of memory during real-time use. • Better generalization and contextual understanding. 5/ The "Surprise" Mechanism: Humans remember surprising events better. Titans use a "surprise" metric to prioritize what to memorize and forget. • Adaptive Forgetting ensures efficiency. • Surprising inputs create stronger memory retention. This leads to smarter, leaner models. 6/ Three Architectural Variants: Titans offer flexible implementations based on use cases: • Memory as Context (MAC): Best for tasks needing detailed historical context. • Memory as Gated (MAG): Balances short- and long-term memory. • Memory as Layer (MAL): Most efficient, slightly less powerful. Trade-offs for every need! 7/ Performance: Titans outperform Transformers and other models in: • Language modeling. • Common-sense reasoning. • Needle-in-a-haystack tasks (retrieving data in vast contexts). • DNA modeling & time-series forecasting. They maintain high accuracy even with millions of tokens. 8/ Why This Matters: • Massive Context: No more limits on how much info models can process. • Real-Time Adaptation: Models learn dynamically, like humans. • Scalability: Opens the door for AI in genomics, long video understanding, and reasoning across massive datasets. 9/ Key Innovations: • Surprise-based memory prioritization. • Efficient, scalable architectures with adaptive forgetting. • Parallelizable training algorithms for better hardware utilization. Titans bridges the gap between AI and human-like reasoning. 10/ What’s Next? With Titans, we could see breakthroughs in AI applications that demand massive context, from personalized healthcare to real-time video analytics. Read the paper here: https://lnkd.in/gBSPtkpf Check out my video breakdown here: https://lnkd.in/gbcdbN8S What do you think of Titans? Let’s discuss. 💬
- +5
-
Everyone’s chasing 100K+ context windows… But real intelligence isn’t just about seeing more. It’s about remembering. Memory is the next frontier — and a new layer of infrastructure is emerging to support it. If your app needs to recall, personalize, or adapt over time — memory is no longer optional. Four key components of AI memory systems: Short-Term Memory – recent turns for coherence + reasoning Long-Term Memory – identity, facts, preferences Retrieval – vector search, graphs, hybrid approaches Updating – dynamic reinforcement & revision These systems are loops — not pipelines. Agents retrieve, reflect, and revise in real time. Two leaders in memory infra: 🌀 Mem0 – composable hybrid (vector + graph + kv), adaptive updates, multi-level recall 🌀 Zep AI (YC W24) – temporal graphs, structured sessions, LangChain-ready Control vs Scale. Both are reshaping LLM memory Other emerging players: Memoripy – local, lightweight, clustering + decay LangMem – context compression via summarization Memary – graph-first, persistent knowledge Cognee – structured RAG grounding Letta – memory for local LLMs (vLLM, Ollama) Architectural bets vary — from clustering vs graph to global vs session memory. Some memory lives inside frameworks that are useful for short-term or inter-agent sync. But for persistent, semantic memory, standalone layers are essential. We’re not just prompting anymore, we’re designing systems that remember. In the new LLM stack, memory is the multiplier.
-
Last week, researchers from the UCL AI Centre and Huawei Noah's Ark Lab published #Memento, a framework demonstrating that agents can achieve state-of-the-art performance through sophisticated external memory without fine-tuning the underlying language model. This methodology achieved remarkable benchmarks while also using 50-80% fewer computational resources than traditional fine-tuning approaches. So what? As we continue to watch progress on Agentic AI, a key question remains: How should agents learn from experience? AI agents require the ability to remember, reflect, and improve from their own interactions with the world. This is what distinguishes true agents from sophisticated automation. Without memory, agents are like Leonard Shelby, the main character in Christopher Nolan's film “Memento,” who suffers from anterograde amnesia, a condition that prevents him from forming new long-term memories after a head injury. By demonstrating that agents can achieve state-of-the-art performance by augmenting them with sophisticated external memory and not just by enhancing the underlying language model, the Memento research introduces what I qualify as a true #Discontinuity, not mere disruption or innovation, but a fundamental break in established patterns of value creation. In my latest Decoding Discontinuity newsletter, I dig into the implications of Memento and the birth of "execution data" as a new strategic asset in the Agentic Era. Link in the comments. ⤵️
-
💡 As banks and insurers scale their use of LLMs, one thing is clear: memory is the next foundational layer in enterprise AI. It's not just about bigger context windows—true intelligence comes from remembering, adapting, and evolving over time. In my latest blog, I explore why memory infrastructure is essential for financial services, covering: 🔹 Short-term vs. long-term memory in LLMs 🔹 Retrieval and updating loops—beyond static prompts 🔹 Real use cases in fraud detection, underwriting, and claims 🔹 New memory-native tools like Mem0, Zep AI, and others 🔹 Architectural choices: vector vs. graph, session vs. global memory As the AI stack matures, memory isn’t a feature—it’s a strategic enabler. If your system needs to personalize, adapt, or comply—it needs memory. #AI #GenAI #LLM #BankingAI #InsuranceTech #AgenticAI #MemoryInfrastructure #RAG #AIProduct
-
How can we improve our AI Agents with procedural memory? This new paper showcases a framework called Memp : https://lnkd.in/gjGp2C7g Memp, a novel framework to empower LLM-based agents with learnable, updatable, and lifelong procedural memory—going beyond brittle, prompt-based memory or buried model parameters. Most AI agents today struggle to complete long, multi-step tasks efficiently. Without memory, they waste time exploring identical actions every time, unable to build upon past experiences. Memp changes this by treating procedural knowledge as a first-class citizen. With Memp, developers can build more efficient, adaptive AI agents that learn from past tasks, not just repeat them. Smaller models can leverage experience from larger ones—saving compute and resources. It opens the door to self-improving agents with lasting memory and better generalization across tasks.