On soliciting external letters for tenure (or be prepared). I was recently asked ‘how do u know who to suggest write my external evaluation for tenure. External evaluations, or letters, are used in many countries to inject fairness into faculty hiring and retention processes. The idea is, that the evaluator is (a) not tied to your uni and (b) not tied to you, so they can write a reasoned and dispassionate assessment of your work. So the process is fair, most uni’s will ask a candidate for promotion to suggest evaluators and then will add additional letter writers. In theory, the idea is great. In practice, it is most often great. Most evaluators want to be reasonable, support junior faculty, and will only write tough letters if someone has failed to perform by reasonably objective metrics. Usually, the school that requests the letters will provide some kind of information on what those metrics should be. Who you suggest is important, bc this is your opportunity to shape your evaluation- beyond what you have done in the classroom, publication, and service - often it’s your last input into the process. So take it seriously. So what should you look for? If asked to suggest letter writers? First, you need people that your school defines as credible. That usually means they have the rank, they work at a place that is considered a peer or better, and they have recently published well. The evaluator should be well known. Second, you need to sort out the appropriate rank and peer school part. To do so, you really need to talk to your colleagues in advance. They will give you a feel for what makes sense for your school. At my place, we want evaluators who come from peer institutions, often hold name professorships, and who have global reputations. Other places focus more on content expertise or are less picky about professorships. It varies - so know your local context. Third, know that most desirable letter writers are booked months in advance - and most just do a few a year. So you want to be prepared with your list of recommendations, when asked - so the uni can ask a letter writer quickly - and you optimize the chances you get who you want. Fourth, you do want a letter writer who knows your topic. Generally, the letter writer will be asked to assess the quality of your work, its impact and trajectory. You want the assessment to by at least one person who appreciates the challenges of publishing your topic. Fifth, know that not all letter writers are kind. You will want to work with your advisor or a senior mentor, & ask them about the person’s reputation as a letter writer. There is a quiet grapevine about letter writers. They will know! Finally, know that if you recommend non-credible evaluators, it is not appreciated. You want to be appreciated. So don’t just pick people that you know or have heard are easy letter writers. Pick credible people. Good luck!
Soliciting Letters of Support
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Soliciting letters of support means requesting written endorsements or evaluations from credible individuals to help strengthen applications, promotions, or proposals, such as for jobs, academic tenure, or immigration cases. These letters provide objective perspectives on your achievements, skills, and impact, often playing a vital role in decision-making processes.
- Identify credible contacts: Choose endorsers with recognized expertise or reputable standing in your field to ensure that their support carries weight with decision-makers.
- Communicate your goals: Clearly explain the purpose of the letter and highlight the achievements or qualities you want the writer to address so they can provide specific, persuasive details.
- Plan ahead: Ask for letters of support well in advance, as respected professionals are often busy and may need ample time to craft a thoughtful endorsement.
-
-
Day two! Before we touch a single word on your resume, we’re starting with something even more important - your references. You might think you have this covered, but keep reading! You need people who can remind you of your strengths when you start to doubt them. A job search can shake your confidence. It’s easy to look at your experience and wonder if any of it really stands out. But the people who worked alongside you? They know the impact you made. They remember the way you solved problems, showed up when it mattered, and made things happen. That’s why today’s step is about gathering the people who can help you see yourself more clearly. These are the bosses, customers, coworkers, mentors, and peers who: ✔️ Worked closely with you and saw your strengths in action. ✔️ Can remind you of accomplishments you might have overlooked. ✔️ Would be happy to write a LinkedIn recommendation or letter of support. ✔️ Might even be on a job search themselves. In proposals, we call them Subject Matter Experts, and they review content and weigh in with details that help strengthen the story. In this case, these people will be SMEs with first hand knowledge of your abilities and strengths, and they will help you refine those details. You don’t have to put them on a resume (but you can!) For now, what matters is that you have them in your corner. These are the people you can turn to and say, “I’m applying for this job. Based on what you saw in my work, what do you think I should highlight?” Their answers will make your resume stronger, your interviews easier, and your confidence higher. 📆 What to Do Today 1️⃣ Make a list of three to five people who fit this description. 2️⃣ Reach out and ask if they’d be willing to be a sounding board during your job search. 3️⃣ Ask them to write you a LinkedIn recommendation. The right people can help you see what you bring to the table and remind you of things you might not even realize about yourself. They help you give yourself the credit you deserve, and that's the first step. See you Monday for step two :) Have a great weekend!
-
Most NIW reference letters fail before they even begin. That’s because people think they’re just asking for a few nice words from colleagues or mentors. But a strong NIW letter isn’t about praise, it’s about persuasion. When I’m reviewing these letters for clients, I’m looking for a few things: First, does the writer have the credibility to speak about you? USCIS wants to know who this person is, why their opinion matters, and how they know your work (or why they’ve studied it, even if they don’t know you personally). Next, does the letter explain your field in plain English? An officer who isn’t an expert should still be able to understand what you do, and why it matters. Then comes the substance: real, concrete achievements with measurable impact. Think adoption of your work by industry, patents in use, technologies deployed, or policies influenced. Finally, and most importantly, the letter has to connect your work to the national interest of the United States. It’s not enough to say you’re accomplished. It needs to explain why your contributions make a difference here and now, and why you’re uniquely positioned to continue that work in the U.S. The best letters close with a clear, confident statement of support. No hedging. No vague “they’re talented” lines. Just a straightforward endorsement that leaves no doubt. If you’re gathering NIW references, remember: you’re not just asking for a favor, you’re building one of the most important parts of your case. #immigrationtips #eb2niw #eb1a #h1b #f1visa #greencard