This paragraph is from The Art of Electronics third edition:
Some more home-grown philosophy: there is a tendency among beginners to want to compute resistor values and other circuit component values to many significant places, particularly with calculators and computers that readily oblige. There are two reasons you should try to avoid falling into this habit: (a) the components themselves are of finite precision (resistors typically have tolerances of ±5% or ±1%; for capacitors it’s typically ±10% or ±5%; and the parameters that characterize transistors, say, frequently are known only to a factor of 2); (b) one mark of a good circuit design is insensitivity of the finished circuit to precise values of the components (there are exceptions, of course). You’ll also learn circuit intuition more quickly if you get into the habit of doing approximate calculations in your head, rather than watching meaningless numbers pop up on a calculator display. We believe strongly that reliance on formulas and equations early in your electronic circuit education is a fine way to prevent you from understanding what’s really going on.
I can analysis the sentence "the parameters that characterize transistors, say, frequently are known only to "a factor of 2". The subject is "the parameters"(or "parameters"), the predicate is "are"(or "are known"), the object is "a factor of 2" but I don't know how much a factor of 2 is. How should I understand "a factor of 2" in here?
