Reductive evolution
Reductive evolution is a process involving the progressive loss of genes, also known as reductive genomic evolution. This process has occurred across both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, particularly in organisms that live as endosymbionts or parasites.[1][2] This was also an evolutionary process, evident in the transformation of symbionts into cell organelles, as seen in the origin of mitochondria and chloroplasts, through the symbiogenesis process.[2]
Mechanisms
[edit]Two main factors drive gene loss: gene essentiality and environmental variability. When organisms have several genes that perform the same functions, this redundancy makes them dispensable and prone to being lost over time. Environmental changes can also shift which genes are necessary; for instance, a gene in charge of nutrient acquisition may become more expressed in a poor nutrient environment.[1][3][4] Once the gene is no longer needed, it may accumulate mutations, become non-functional, and eventually be eliminated from the genome through drift or selection.[4][5]
Another specific mechanism that can promote gene loss through ecological dependency is the black queen hypothesis, where microorganisms rely on extracellular metabolites produced by other symbiotic microbes in their environment. This circumstance makes the microorganisms dependent on one another by reducing, getting rid of the genes responsible for producing their own metabolites. It can also be a from obligate intracellular organisms that reduce their genomes and become dependent on the host to produce metabolites for the organism to use.[6]
Examples of reductive evolution
[edit]Bacteria
[edit]Reductive evolution in symbiont bacteria has been widely studied because their genomes show marked changes compared with their free-living ancestors.[1] In these organisms, gene loss is primarily driven by a neutral process; the small population sizes inside hosts promote the accumulation of deleterious mutations and leading to the progressive loss of non-essential genes.[7]
Both pathogenetic and mutualistic symbiotic bacteria have undergone genome reduction, but they retain different genes according to their ecological roles.[7] Pathogenic bacteria retain genes involved in virulence,[7] whereas mutualistic endosymbiotic keep genes required for synthesizing nutrients that benefit the host.[8]
One of the most studied cases is the parasitic bacterium, Rickettsia prowazekii, which has lost so many essential genes that it cannot survive outside its host. Other mutualistic symbioses, such as Buchnera aphidicola in aphids, and Wolbachia bacteria in Wuchereria bancrofti also exhibited genome reduction and have also been widely studied have all been studied and fully sequenced, which is why they are used as examples of reductive evolution.[1]
Fungi
[edit]Although reduction evolution has been widely studied in bacteria, this process also occurs in fungi, particularly mycorrhizal mutualists. Genomic analyses show that ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi have progressively lost many genes specialized in cell wall degradation, known as plant cell wall–degrading enzymes (PCWDEs). Compared with their ancestors, white-rot decayers and brown-rot decayers, ECM fungi retain only about 47% and 77%, respectively.[9]
During the mutualistic association with plants, ECM fungi receive fixed carbohydrates from the host. Because of this nutrient supplementation, they no longer needed the full set of enzymes used by saprotrophic fungi at the same scale; genes focused on the plant cell wall degradation.[9] However, some retained PCWDEs genes are essential, because they allow the fungi colonization in the apoplast area and acquire nutrients from the soil in inorganic and organic forms.[10]
Besides gene loss, ECM fungi have also evolved new genes that support symbiosis. One example is the family of mycorrhiza-induced small secreted proteins (MiSSPs), which play a key role in establishing and maintaining the symbiotic interaction, as shown in species such as Laccaria bicolor.[11]
Endosymbiotic theory
[edit]Endosymbiotic processes involve reductive evolution as a part of the symbiosis between the endosymbiont and the host, and the endosymbiont transitions into an organelle. Progressively, several genes are transferred from the endosymbiont to the host nucleus, while other unnecessary genes are progressively lost.[7]

Reductive evolution is the central component of the Endosymbiotic Theory, developed by Lynn Margulis.[12][13] This theory proposes that mitochondria originated from an alphaproteobacterial endosymbiont that became an organelle within the ancestral archaea.[14][7]
A second major example of reductive evolution through endosymbiosis is the origin of the plastids. Plastids arose from a primary endosymbiosis, when a protist engulfed a photosynthetic cyanobacterium and giving rise to algae and land plants.[15] Secondary endosymbiosis occurs when an eukaryotic alga that already contains a primary plastid is engulfed by another protist. Examples include Guillardia, cryptophyte algae with a plastid obtained from a red alga, and many diatoms that contain chromophyte algae and oomycetes.[15] Some protists have undergone tertiary endosymbiosis, in which a eukaryote engulfs another eukaryote that has already acquired a secondary plastid. For example, Alexandrium (Dinoflagellate) contains a plastid derived from a secondary endosymbiotic event.[15]
History
[edit]Whole genome sequences over time have served to corroborate the idea of gene loss in some microbes during symbiosis and also in endosymbiosis.[16] This new information, together with new technologies in phylogenomics to reconstruct ancestral lineages, provided sufficient information for model organisms such as Rickettsia prowazekii and endosymbiotic bacteria related to mitochondria and plastids.[3][17] Although fossils help establish the timing of endosymbiotic origins, they cannot directly reveal genome reduction, which is inferred primarily from comparative genomic analyses.[13][9]
Gene loss identification
[edit]There are several methods used to identify which genes have been lost by comparing the genomes of modern organisms with those of their ancestors. Common phylogenetic methods include maximum parsimony (MP) or maximum likelihood (ML).[3] These methods use patterns to recreate the evolutionary tree of these species and their gene compositions of the ancient forms, as well as the gene losses and gains along the tree branches, which are then compared to identify the similarity between them.
A widely used model species for studying reduction evolution is Rickettsia prowazekii, an obligate intracellular alphaproteobacterium of some multicellular eukaryotes. Researchers have found through the use of phylogenetic methods that this species has lost between 1254 and 1700 genes in comparison with its ancestor.[5][18][19] The genes that were retained are primarily those required for parasitism, while genes involved in the biosynthesis of amino acids and nucleotides were primarily lost.[18] This result confirms the genome changes that can be observed in organisms that depend heavily on their host for key metabolites.
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d Wilcox JL, Dunbar HE, Wolfinger RD, Moran NA (June 2003). "Consequences of reductive evolution for gene expression in an obligate endosymbiont". Molecular Microbiology. 48 (6): 1491–500. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03522.x. PMID 12791133.
- ^ a b Andersson SG, Kurland CG (July 1998). "Reductive evolution of resident genomes". Trends in Microbiology. 6 (7): 263–8. doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(98)01312-2. PMID 9717214.
- ^ a b c Wolf YI, Koonin EV (September 2013). "Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution". BioEssays. 35 (9): 829–37. Bibcode:2013BiEss..35..829W. doi:10.1002/bies.201300037. PMC 3840695. PMID 23801028.
- ^ a b Albalat, Ricard; Cañestro, Cristian (July 2016). "Evolution by gene loss". Nature Reviews Genetics. 17 (7): 379–391. doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.39. ISSN 1471-0064. PMID 27087500.
- ^ a b Wang M, Yafremava LS, Caetano-Anollés D, Mittenthal JE, Caetano-Anollés G (November 2007). "Reductive evolution of architectural repertoires in proteomes and the birth of the tripartite world". Genome Research. 17 (11): 1572–85. doi:10.1101/gr.6454307. PMC 2045140. PMID 17908824.
- ^ Song H, Hwang J, Yi H, Ulrich RL, Yu Y, Nierman WC, Kim HS (May 2010). "The early stage of bacterial genome-reductive evolution in the host". PLOS Pathogens. 6 (5) e1000922. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000922. PMC 2877748. PMID 20523904.
- ^ a b c d e Delmotte F, Rispe C, Schaber J, Silva FJ, Moya A (July 2006). "Tempo and mode of early gene loss in endosymbiotic bacteria from insects". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 6: 56. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-56. PMC 1544356. PMID 16848891.
- ^ Sloan, Daniel B.; Moran, Nancy A. (December 2012). "Genome reduction and co-evolution between the primary and secondary bacterial symbionts of psyllids". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 29 (12): 3781–3792. doi:10.1093/molbev/mss180. ISSN 1537-1719. PMC 3494270. PMID 22821013.
- ^ a b c Kohler, Annegret; Kuo, Alan; Nagy, Laszlo G.; Morin, Emmanuelle; Barry, Kerrie W.; Buscot, Francois; Canbäck, Björn; Choi, Cindy; Cichocki, Nicolas; Clum, Alicia; Colpaert, Jan; Copeland, Alex; Costa, Mauricio D.; Doré, Jeanne; Floudas, Dimitrios (April 2015). "Convergent losses of decay mechanisms and rapid turnover of symbiosis genes in mycorrhizal mutualists". Nature Genetics. 47 (4): 410–415. doi:10.1038/ng.3223. ISSN 1546-1718. PMID 25706625.
- ^ Tunlid, Anders; Floudas, Dimitrios; Op De Beeck, Michiel; Wang, Tao; Persson, Per (2022-07-22). "Decomposition of soil organic matter by ectomycorrhizal fungi: Mechanisms and consequences for organic nitrogen uptake and soil carbon stabilization". Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. 5 934409. Bibcode:2022FrFGC...5.4409T. doi:10.3389/ffgc.2022.934409. ISSN 2624-893X.
- ^ Plett, Jonathan M.; Daguerre, Yohann; Wittulsky, Sebastian; Vayssières, Alice; Deveau, Aurelie; Melton, Sarah J.; Kohler, Annegret; Morrell-Falvey, Jennifer L.; Brun, Annick; Veneault-Fourrey, Claire; Martin, Francis (2014-06-03). "Effector MiSSP7 of the mutualistic fungus Laccaria bicolor stabilizes the Populus JAZ6 protein and represses jasmonic acid (JA) responsive genes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111 (22): 8299–8304. Bibcode:2014PNAS..111.8299P. doi:10.1073/pnas.1322671111. PMC 4050555. PMID 24847068.
- ^ Margulis L. "Endosymbiosis". evolution.berkeley.edu. Retrieved 2019-11-08.
- ^ a b "Reductive evolution of microbial genomes". Department of Biology, Lund University. 11 July 2018. Archived from the original on 4 September 2019. Retrieved 2019-09-30.
- ^ Khachane AN, Timmis KN, Martins dos Santos VA (February 2007). "Dynamics of reductive genome evolution in mitochondria and obligate intracellular microbes". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 24 (2): 449–56. doi:10.1093/molbev/msl174. hdl:10033/19778. PMID 17108184.
- ^ a b c Bhattacharya, Debashish; Yoon, Hwan Su; Hackett, Jeremiah D. (January 2004). "Photosynthetic eukaryotes unite: endosymbiosis connects the dots". BioEssays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology. 26 (1): 50–60. doi:10.1002/bies.10376. ISSN 0265-9247. PMID 14696040.
- ^ Moran, Nancy A. (2002). "Microbial Minimalism". Cell. 108 (5): 583–586. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00665-7. PMID 11893328.
- ^ Wolf, Yuri I.; Makarova, Kira S.; Yutin, Natalya; Koonin, Eugene V. (2012-12-14). "Updated clusters of orthologous genes for Archaea: a complex ancestor of the Archaea and the byways of horizontal gene transfer". Biology Direct. 7 (1): 46. Bibcode:2012BiDir...7...46W. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-7-46. ISSN 1745-6150. PMC 3534625. PMID 23241446.
- ^ a b Blanc, Guillaume; Ogata, Hiroyuki; Robert, Catherine; Audic, Stéphane; Suhre, Karsten; Vestris, Guy; Claverie, Jean-Michel; Raoult, Didier (2007-01-19). "Reductive Genome Evolution from the Mother of Rickettsia". PLOS Genetics. 3 (1): e14. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0030014. ISSN 1553-7404. PMC 1779305. PMID 17238289.
- ^ Andersson JO, Andersson SG (September 1999). "Genome degradation is an ongoing process in Rickettsia". Molecular Biology and Evolution. 16 (9): 1178–91. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026208. PMID 10486973.