Wikipedia:Featured list candidates

Nominating featured lists in Wikipedia Welcome to featured list candidates! Here, we determine which lists are of a good enough quality to be featured lists (FLs). Featured lists exemplify Wikipedia's very best work and must satisfy the featured list criteria. Before nominating a list, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at peer review. This process is not a substitute for peer review. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the featured list candidate (FLC) process. Those who are not significant contributors to the list should consult regular editors of the list before nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly. A list should not be listed at featured list candidates and another review process at the same time. Nominators who have previously successfully nominated a list may have two concurrent featured list nominations only if the first active nomination has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed. The featured list director, Giants2008, or his delegates, PresN and Hey man im josh, determine the timing of the process for each nomination. Each nomination will typically last at least twenty days, but may last longer if changes are ongoing or insufficient discussion or analysis has occurred. For a nomination to be promoted to FL status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The directors determine whether there is consensus. A nomination will be removed from the list and archived if, in the judgment of the director who considers a nomination and its reviews: actionable objections have not been resolved in a timely manner; or consensus for promotion has not been reached after significant time; or reviewers are unable to judge whether the criteria have been met. It is assumed that all nominations have good qualities; this is why the process focuses on finding and resolving problems in relation to the criteria, rather than asserting the positives. Declarations of support are not as important as finding and resolving issues, and the process is not simply vote-counting. Once the director or a delegate has decided to close a nomination, they will do so on the nominations page. A bot will update the list talk page after the list is promoted or the nomination archived, typically within the day, and the {{FLC}} template should remain on the talk page until the bot updates or adds the {{Article history}} template. If a nomination is archived, the nominator should take adequate time to resolve issues before re-nominating.  – Table of contents – Closing instructions

Featured content: Featured articles Featured lists ← Featured pictures Featured topics Featured list tools: Featured list criteria Featured list candidates Featured list removal candidates Featured list statistics Wikipedians by promoted featured list nominations Today's featured list This month's queue TFL submissions TFL statistics Featured lists that have appeared as TFL Featured lists yet to appear as TFL Featured list log Random featured list Former featured lists Removal candidates log

Nomination procedure Before nominating a list, ensure that it meets all of the FL criteria and that any peer reviews are closed and archived. It is recommended that the list have no other open discussions. Place {{subst:FLC}} on the talk page of the nominated list. From the FLC template, click on the red "initiate the nomination" link. You will see pre-loaded information; leave that text. If you are unsure how to complete a nomination, please leave a post on the FLC talk page for assistance. Below the preloaded title, complete the nomination page, sign with ~~~~ and save the page. Finally, place {{Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/name of nominated list/archiveNumber}} at the top of the list of nominees on this page by first copying the above, clicking "edit" on the top of this page, and then pasting, making sure to add the name of the nominated list. When adding a candidate, mention the name of the list in the edit summary. Reviewing procedure Please read a nominated list fully before deciding to support or oppose a nomination. To respond to a nomination, click the "Edit" link to the right of the list nomination (not the "Edit this page" link for the whole FLC page). To support a nomination, write * '''Support''', followed by your reason(s). If you have been a significant contributor to the list before its nomination, please indicate this. Supports are weighted more strongly if they are given alongside justifications that indicate that the list was fully reviewed; a nomination is not just a straight vote. To oppose a nomination, write * '''Oppose''', followed by your reason(s). Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the director may ignore it. Please focus your attention on substantive issues or inconsistencies, rather than personal style preferences. Reviewers who object are strongly encouraged to return after a few days to check whether their objection has been addressed, and nominators are encouraged to use {{reply to}} or other templates to notify reviewers when replying. To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s> ... </s>), rather than removing it. If a nominator feels that an oppose vote has been addressed, they should say so, rather than striking out the reviewer's text. Nominators should not cap, alter, strike, or add graphics to comments from other editors; replies are added below the signature on the reviewer's commentary. If a nominator finds that an opposing reviewer is not returning to the nomination page to revisit improvements, this should be noted on the nomination page. Graphics (such as {{done}} and {{not done}}) are discouraged, as they slow down the page load time. To provide constructive input on a nomination without specifically supporting or objecting, write * '''Comment''' followed by your advice.

Nominations urgently needing reviews edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated almost 2 months ago and have had their review time extended because objections are still being addressed, the nomination has not received enough reviews, or insufficient information has been provided by reviewers to judge whether the criteria have been met. If you have not yet reviewed them, please take the time to do so: List of Intangible Cultural Heritage elements in Ukraine (FLC) Electoral history of Dan Quayle (FLC) Ken Carson discography (FLC) List of House of Representatives constituencies of Belize (FLC) List of governors of Imo State (FLC) Timeline of the first Trump presidency (2017 Q1) (FLC) Source reviews needed List of presidents of the Maldives (FLC) edit · history · watch · refresh The following lists were nominated for removal more than 14 days ago:

Nominations

Norwegian Figure Skating Championships

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Another list of national figure skating champions for your consideration. This one should be easier than Hungarian Figure Skating Championships, which was just promoted, because none of the sources are locked behind a paywall. They are, however, in Norwegian for the most part. While I don’t speak Norwegian, I found these sources easier to navigate because it turns out Norwegian (along with Swedish and Danish) have a lot of similarities to German (I am a German teacher). And while Norway has historically been a winter sports powerhouse, you can see from the tables that competitive figure skating has not been as big in Norway as it has been elsewhere. Special thank you to User:Migrant for scanning pages from the Norwegian Skating Association’s handbook for me as well as other assistance with Norwegian. Please let me know if you have any concerns or suggestions, and thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:56, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Note: Neither Old News nor the National Library of Norway will cooperate with Internet Archive. 😒 Bgsu98 (Talk) 03:03, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

• Thanks for the recognition. This weekend I won't be able to help out, since I will be attending 2025–26 ISU Speed Skating World Cup – World Cup 4 at Hamar, which is my focus-sport on wikipedia and that is mostly on my home-langauge Norwegian wikipedia. Best regards Migrant (talk – contribs) 15:51, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

  Kos deg! Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

List of Olympic medalists for Singapore

Nominator(s): 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 23:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because this list has good prose, is comprehensive, and meets all requirements for accessibility and FL criteria. This is my third FL nomination and all comments will be appreciated. Regards, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 23:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Image review

• File:Flag of Singapore.svg - PD
• File:SingaporeWomensTableTennisTeam-2008SummerOlympics-20080825-02.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• Pictograms are all PD, alt text passes Pass image review

User:Easternsahara_{review this} 22:22, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara: Shouldn't the pictograms have alt text as well? A user highlighted this a while ago. Icepinner 07:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

You are correct, Nuggeteer, could you please add this to the article? it should just be alt= and then the sport that they are playing. You may also wish to do this with your previous nominations User:Easternsahara_{review this} 16:37, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Icepinner

Exciting to see a Singapore list in FLC! I may conduct a full review in due time since I am a bit busy with IRL stuff, but for now, I note that [2] has a publication date whilst the rest of the Olympic sources don't. Template:Cite web says "if [the publication date is] unknown, use access-date instead". Icepinner 07:08, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Also, per MOS:ORDER, we need an ENGVAR template for this article. Add Template:Use British English, as Singapore was a former British colony, and British English is still widely used here. Icepinner 07:20, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

@Icepinner: "[2] has a publication date whilst the rest of the Olympic sources don't" I do not see any issue with this, as I used both publication date (if there is) and access date. I have also added the British ENGVAR template, but I used American English during the creation of this article, and it might raise some issues. Thank you for offering to review this article! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 09:52, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for adding the British ENGVAR template, TheNuggeteer. Regarding the publication date, I may have misinterpreted it when I read this FLC? Dunno, thought that consistent ref formatting is an unspoken rule of the FLC criteria? Anyways, that really isn't a big issue for me. I've some time to kill, and I have conducted a prose review since the article is pretty short. Feel free to disagree with the below if there are any issues. Icepinner 14:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Full-review

• Singapore debuted in the Olympics as a British colony in 1948 when a sole representative, Lloyd Valberg I think we can link "British colony" to Colony of Singapore. We also have an article on Lloyd Valberg. Icepinner 14:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)
• Joseph Schooling won a gold medal when he succeeded in the Men's 100 meter butterfly. This also caused him to beat Michael Phelps' Olympic record in the event I am not sure if I like the wording here; the source states that "he clocked an Olympic record time of 50.39 seconds to beat swimming legend Michael Phelps to gold", but the article implies that Schooling winning a gold medal was the motivation to beat Philips (maybe I'm tired? Who knows). Icepinner 14:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Not a lot of issues I can find that impede the article from FL status. I'll take another look once the above issues (including the pictogram concerns) have been addressed. Icepinner 14:53, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

@Icepinner: I have fixed both. Also, I assume you mean that it is required to have a publication date for all sources. Regarding that, the Olympedia sources do not provide publication dates; hence, I cannot include them. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 22:29, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, TheNuggeteer. Yes, but I was referring to how you can use the date of access as the source date per Template:Cite web (would this be the same as the publication date, though?). Icepinner 02:20, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@Icepinner: I just place the date I accessed the source in access date and, if there is, add a publication date. I see nothing wrong with this, and I have used this system in my previous featured list. Regards, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:10, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• Unless Singapore has no plans to ever compete at the Olympics again, then "Overall, Singapore won a gold medal, two silver medals, and three bronze medals, gaining a total of six medals." should be "Overall, Singapore has won a gold medal, two silver medals, and three bronze medals, gaining a total of six medals." -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:28, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: fixed. Thank you for the comment! 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 22:29, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

More comments

• "The delegation won its first medal in the 1960 Summer Olympics " => "The delegation won its first medal at the 1960 Summer Olympics "

• Fixed

• "Overall, Singapore has won a gold medal, two silver medals, and three bronze medals, gaining a total of six medals." - are those last six words really needed? I would imagine that most readers can calculate 1+2+3.......

• Removed

• Link Singapore, Olympics, all the individual Olympics, Tan Howe Liang, etc in body as well as lead

• I portray this as unnecessary overlinking per WP:LINKONCE: you should only link at most once in the first occurrence. Since the prose is short here, this list should especially follow this rule.

• Further up that page it specifically says "But as a rule of thumb, link only the first occurrence of a term in both the lead and body of the article" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

• " joined the high jump competition" => " competed in the high jump". "Joined the competition" makes it sound like he was just wandering past and thought "that looks fun, I'll join in" ;-)

• Fixed

• "Singapore has joined every Olympics edition" => "Singapore has taken part in every Olympics edition"

• Fixed

• "except in the 1980 Summer Olympics" => "except the 1980 Summer Olympics"

• Fixed

• "joining a boycott" => "when the country was one of many to boycott the event"

• Fixed

• Only two sentences in the history section have refs. Are those two refs citing everything in the paragraph?

• Yes, they cite everything in the paragraph.

• Medalist tables should sort based on surname, not forename

• This is especially confusing. Singapore has numerous naming traditions and most of the athletes utilize Chinese naming traditions, like Li Jiawei: Li is the family name. Some also have normal naming traditions (Joseph Schooling), causing the names to be unconsistent. Hence, I would suggest leaving it as it is.

• In that case, Li Jiawei should sort under L but Joseph Schooling under S. Joseph Schooling sorting under J is definitely not correct -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:36, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

• In the multiple medalists table, two different types of dash are used

• Fixed

-- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:31, 10 December 2025 (UTC) 

@ChrisTheDude: replied to all. Regards, 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 12:24, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

List of Crash Bandicoot video games

Nominator(s): Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:49, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

After 18 years (10 not counting that hiatus) of working on all notable entries in the Crash Bandicoot video game series, it's time to cap things off with the comprehensive list of such. The lead is engaging as a summary of the series, just about every entry covered by reliable sources has been accounted for, all information comes with adequate citations and is laid out in a series of clean and navigable tables. If anything's amiss, please let me know! Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:49, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• All the tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead. (please  mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:26, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: Fixed. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 12:12, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

List of octodontids

Nominator(s): PresN 03:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Hey y'all, mammal list #66 in our perpetual series and rodent list #11: Octodontidae. This is our 7th and final list covering the Caviomorpha parvorder, aka "things shaped kinda like guinea pigs", with the degus and rock rats, which look like half-rat, half-guinea pigs with tails. They're down at the bottom of South America, mostly up in the mountains and highlands and generally with relatively small ranges, so you almost certainly have never heard of them. There's 14 species, but the 3 that are trapped on an island or pretty restricted to wetlands are critically endangered, while the rest seem to just hang out in or near central Chile eating plants and not bothering anyone. This list was started by Reconrabbit, who has also made several of the maps. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 03:53, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (12/1/25)

No issues at all with the prose. Just two suggestions:

• Recommend wikilinking dung, as that (believe it or not) may not a term familiar to a lot of people.
• The map showing Mocha Island, Chile doesn't really show us where the island is located. Since Chile is very long, we have no idea where along the coast the island is located.
  • How's this? File:Octodon pacificus distribution zoomed.svg -- Reconrabbit 14:38, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

User:PresN: I'll come back later and do your source review for you. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:22, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Linked, and I think Reconrabbit's new map fixes that issue. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 16:37, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, that map is much better. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:43, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Reconrabbit

Since I worked on this pretty heavily in its early stages I don't know how impartial I can be on a review but can at least vouch for the range maps I created being accurate. If there are any needed changes (as above) let me know. -- Reconrabbit 16:06, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

@Reconrabbit: Ah, I'm so sorry, I forgot this was the one that you had put together last year, I meant to put that in the nomination statement. Yes, you did a bunch of work on this list, especially making those maps! --PresN 16:37, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

• Support - nothing to quibble about for me -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:58, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Image review

• File:Degu eating a piece of dried banana.jpg CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Aconaemys fuscus.jpg PD the source for this is dead, could it be archived or could a new link be found?
• File:Aconaemys fuscus map.jpg PD source?
• File:Aconaemys sagei map.jpg PD source?
• File:Octodon degus -Heidelberg Zoo, Germany-8a.jpg CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Octodon degus range.svg CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Octodon lunatus range.svg CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Octodon pacificus distribution zoomed.svg CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Octodontomys gliroides 238516748 CC BY 4.0
• File:Octodontomys gliroides range.svg CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Cururo en el Parque natural Gómez Carreño.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Tympanoctomys barrerae.jpg CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Tympanoctomys barrerae range.png PD (I didn't spot check its sources, but it cites them, so I think its good)

I think the maps from uk.wp could be higher resolution and zoomed in. If you can find replacements that do this, then I'd recommend to use those. Maps don't have alts, thats okay range is described in words. Usually, the recommendation would be to say "see range text" but that comes before the actual map, so I'd say its alr for them to not have alts. Just fix the 2 maps without sources and I'll pass. User:Easternsahara_{review this} 16:49, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara: Fixed the dead source, and removed the two maps from uk.wiki as they don't cite the source and are slightly off from the IUCN maps so I can't assume that was it. --PresN 20:08, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

pass image review User:Easternsahara_{review this} 20:34, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

List of Greek deities

Nominator(s): Michael Aurel (talk) 05:04, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

This page is an attempt at a comprehensive and structured enumeration of the Greek gods, an endeavour which probably requires a fair bit more ambition than common sense. Deities have been grouped in a manner which is in line with authoritative sources, while hopefully still being fairly intuitive to the uninitiated reader. This section of the talk page explains the reasoning behind choices made during the writing of the article (in particular, see the points towards the end, which were made in anticipation of queries about links, dates, and the like). Also, it's worth noting the existence of List of Mesopotamian deities, the only comparable featured list I'm aware of, and List of Hurrian deities and List of Ugaritic deities, two other well-written articles of a similar nature. – Michael Aurel (talk) 05:04, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead. (please  mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:46, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks, fixed. – Michael Aurel (talk) 07:13, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

• Support on accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:29, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

2021 NHL expansion draft

Nominator(s): XR228 (talk) 05:25, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because when I tried nominating this for GA, I was told that this article should be a list, so here I am. It meets everything it should. XR228 (talk) 05:25, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• The image in the infobox is missing alt-text.
• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead. This is for the Draft selections table.
• If the row header cell spans multiple rows with a rowspan, then use !scope=rowgroup instead of scope=row. This is for all the "protected players" tables. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:44, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824: I have made the changes. XR228 (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

  • Don't use only italics to convey information (protected player). This is ignored by screen-readers. Use a symbol instead of OR in addition to the italics. Make sure to add a legend/key.
  • I think the key section of the Draft selections table needs to be reversed: LW = Left wing and so on. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:58, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

    @MPGuy2824: I have made the changes. XR228 (talk) 18:24, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support on accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:39, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
• P.S. Looking at the background section, a lot of the details there don't seem warranted: Introduce the Oak valley group and the team name while saying that the NHL BoG approved their addition, in a couple of sentences. Then move on to the last paragraph of that section with appropriate tweaks.

Comments

• The lead looks very short at just three sentences. There's surely more that can be said.....?
• "As general manager, Francis oversees" - the present tense here will eventually stop being accurate, so maybe change to "As general manager, Francis was given responsibility for"......?
• "who were under contract for the 2021–22 season and played in at least 27 games in the 2020–21 season" => "who were under contract for the 2021–22 season and had played in at least 27 games in the 2020–21 season"
• "The player with an NMC continuing past July 28, 2021, was deemed to have a career-threatening injury and is thus declared exempt from selection and use of a protection slot." => "The player had an NMC continuing past July 28, 2021, was deemed to have a career-threatening injury, and was thus declared exempt from selection and use of a protection slot."
• "the 2021–22 salaries of the thirty players selected (as measured in terms of what is counted against the salary cap, had" - the closing bracket is missing
• "On July 18, the protected player list, a list of players who the Kraken were not allowed to select during the draft" => "On July 18, the protected player list, a list of players whom the Kraken were not allowed to select during the draft"
• "a three-day period where the Seattle Kraken could talk to unrestricted free agents (UFAs) begun" => "a three-day period during which the Seattle Kraken could talk to unrestricted free agents (UFAs) began"
• That's it, I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:44, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: I have made the changes. XR228 (talk) 02:24, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Electoral history of Al Gore

Nominator(s): Olliefant (she/her) 07:15, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

My third Vice President Electoral History list. A personal favorite of mine, Gore has participated in 10ish elections. I would like to thank Darth Kalwejt for creating the page back in 2008. I hope to continue this series of VPEH soon. (currently between someone who would never shoot someone and then make the person they shot apologize to them and Dick Chaney) Olliefant (she/her) 07:15, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

This calls for a celebration! Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:09, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (12/29/25)

• There is some inconsistency on the tables with regards to the word "incumbent". Sometimes it's wikilinked; sometimes it's capitalized; etc. I recommend picking one format and sticking with it. Done
• I think "Election Day" is a proper noun and should be capitalized. Done

Lead

• "and his third defeating by Republican challenger James B. Seigneur." – Get rid of that "by". Done
• "to be his running mate in 1992 United States presidential election." – You need an article after "in". Done

1976

• "Joe L. Evins announced he would not be seeking another term" – Recommend rewording as "announced that he would not seek another term"; the progressive tense is not needed. Done
• "The primary race was close, with Gore and Tennessee House of Representatives Speaker Stanley Rogers as the front runners." – I would recommend rephrasing as "Gore and ... emerging as the front runners." Done

1978

• Recommend rewording those large numbers as 90,000 and 108,000, and so on.
  • Opted to make words for consistency

1982

• "around thirty thousand less votes" – Should be "fewer votes". Done

1984

• Democratic should be capitalized when referring to the political party. Done

1990

• "Republican Representative Don Sundquist felt that the Hawkins was a weak candidate" – You don't need that "the". Done

1988 Democratic Primary

• "followed by Jackson at 37% with Gore receiving only 10%." – You need something between "37%" and "with". Done

1992 nomination

• "Governor Bill Clinton considered around forty different politicians to be his running mate." – Recommend replacing "about" with "approximately". Not done
  • The exact number is unknown, I found varying numbers and the LA Times article cited said Clinton "had a list of about 40 possibilities" so I just went with "around fourty"
    • For some reason, I read that as “about” when you clearly used “around”. Your original sentence is fine.
• Is there a wikilink for shortlist?
  • I've added 1992 Democratic Party vice presidential candidate selection (I could've sworn I already added it)

1996

• You probably don't need two subheaders considering how small both sections are, but that's up to you.
  • I just left it for consistency,
• Who was the Secretary of HUD, Dole or Kemp?
  • Kemp, I've tweaked it a bit, but I don't know how to improve the wording without running into a MOS:SOB issue

2000 nomination

• Recommend writing out Democratic National Convention. Done
• "He formerly announced..." – I believe you mean "formally". Done

General election

• You have Dick Cheney misspelled as "Dick Chaney". Done He won't like that; his ghost might shoot you in the face while quail hunting and call it an accident...
  He didn't :(
• "Gore initially gave a concession speech; however he retracted it after a recount was ordered.[1] However, the Supreme Court's 5–4 decision in Bush v. Gore" Too many howevers in close proximity. Done
• "Some Democrats attributed Gore's loss to the presence of third party candidate Ralph Nader of the Green Party causing a "spoiler effect" detracting from Gore's vote count in Florida and New Hampshire." – There's something wonky here; something between "spoiler effect" and "detracting". Done

User:Olliefant: Please let me know when you've had a chance to examine these comments! Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:23, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Thank you for the review, I hope I addressed all of your concerns. Olliefant (she/her) 01:50, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

User:Olliefant: Looks good! Support. I will do your source review later today. I think I did the source review for Dan Quayle too, but if not, I'll do that one too. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:03, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Image review (11/30/25)

All of the images have appropriate licenses and captions. The maps do not have any alt-text. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:06, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Source review (11/30/25)

This table checks 15 passages from throughout the article (19.7% of 76 total passages). These passages contain 20 inline citations (17.9% of 112 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:38, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Reference #	Letter	Source	Archive	Status	Notes
Nine different candidates sought the Democratic nomination.
4	a	newspapers.com			This article says nothing about nine candidates seeking the Democratic nomination. Approved
5		newspapers.com			The article describes Gore's competition in the primary as "crowded", but did not cite numbers.
McGlamery did not actively campaign and only ran to prevent Gore from winning unopposed. On Election Day, Gore won in a landslide, receiving 94 percent of the vote.
7	b	Guthrie, Benjamin J. (April 15, 1977). Statistics of the Presidential and Congressional election of…			Unable to access as no link provided.
9		newspapers.com			This source verifies the first statement ("McGlamery did not..."). I recommend moving this citation to directly after that statement, as it does not verify that second statement ("On Election Day...").
He was challenged in the general election by Republican James B. Seigneur. Seigneur ran as he disliked the fact that Gore won unopposed in 1978; he criticized Gore's voting record, labeling it as "disgraceful".
14		newspapers.com			This does support these statements. However, this is clearly a paid political advertisement as stated at the bottom of the page. Is this really the best source available?
A debate between Ashe and Gore was held on October 8, 1984.
25		c-span.org
Gore received almost 480 thousand votes with 54 votes cast for write-in candidates.
28	a	newspapers.com			"480 thousand" looks weird.
Republican Representative Don Sundquist felt that Hawkins was a weak candidate and that Republicans would likely have a better chance of taking the seat in the 1996 election.
33		newspapers.com			I do not see any mention of Hawkins being a weak candidate. If I have missed it, please let me know.
After being elected Vice President in the 1992 presidential election, Gore resigned from his Senate seat on January 2, 1993. Harlan Mathews was appointed to replace him by Governor Ned McWherter.
37		deseret.com			This is going to sound pedantic, but this article describes what would likely happen in the future. The article was written in December 29, 1992; it can't verify events that happened on January 2, 1993. Approved
He hoped to make up for his loss on Super Tuesday.
40	b	cnn.com	web.archive.org
Following his victory in the 1992 Democratic Party presidential primaries, Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton considered around forty different politicians to be his running mate. His shortlist consisted of Gore, Senators Bob Graham of Florida, Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, and Harris Wofford of Pennsylvania, as well as Representative Lee Hamilton of Indiana's 4th congressional district.
52	a	latimes.com			None of those names are cited in this source.
53	a	nytimes.com			This source does cites those names. In fact, this source cites everything in the above statement; you don't need source no. 52 here. Approved
Clinton announced his running mate at the Arkansas Governor's Mansion; during his speech, he emphasized Gore's work in protecting the environment and foreign policy.
53	b	nytimes.com
The Clinton-Gore ticket was the youngest presidential ticket ever elected to the presidency.
53	c	nytimes.com
Following the 1996 Democratic National Convention, many felt Gore was likely to run for president in 2000.
63		newspapers.com
64		newspapers.com
Following Super Tuesday, Bradley conceded the primary and congratulated Gore on his victory.
70		"Super Tuesday, March 7, 2000". archive.nytimes.com. Retrieved November 9, 2025.	archive.nytimes.com		I would change the source to The New York Times in the citation. Approved
On August 17, the two received the Democratic Party's nomination at the 2000 Democratic National Convention.
74		Berke, Richard L. (August 16, 2000). "The Overview: Lieberman Sets Stage for Gore as Democrats Seal…	archive.nytimes.com
His loss has also been attributed to the potentially misleading design of the butterfly ballots used in Palm Beach County, Florida, which heavily leans toward the Democrats, causing Gore voters to accidentally vote for Reform Party candidate Pat Buchanan.
87		nytimes.com
88		cnn.com			I question whether this source is necessary, but that's up to you. Approved

User:Olliefant: There are several issues that require attention as shown on the above chart. Please let me know when you've had a chance to address them! Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:50, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Issue 1. I replaced ref 4 but left ref 5 Approved

Issue 2. No link exists for ref 7, you can download it here

• Recommend adding this link to the citation.

• Not done, I'm citing the PDF file not the House page, It would be like linking to an Amazon listing for a book.

• Okay, that's fine. Approved

Issue 3. Not from what I can tell

• Say what?

What I meant to say was, from what I can tell this is the best source available. The election didn't get much coverage.

• Okay, since what's being verified is what the candidate thought of Gore, it should be acceptable. Approved

Issue 6. The article is on two different pages, the link is to B11 while the fact in question is on B13

• See the following to link regarding how to format two pages for the same article: Wikipedia:Newspapers.com#Citations across multiple pages/clippings. Also, I re-read the article on p. B13, and Sundquist does not mention Hawkins, nor does he say that Republicans would have a better chance of winning a seat in 1996. He simply notes that Gore's seat would likely be vacated if he chooses to run for president. If you want to use this source, I recommend a slight rewrite to better reflect what the source actually says.

• Fixed the citation formatting. However, B13 says: "... the weakness of the Tennessee GOP, as evidenced by their failure to put up strong candidates against Gov. Ned McWherter and Sen. Albert Gore Jr." I did tweak the wording slightly as he says that there was a "very good chance to topple Sasser" Approved

Issue 7. reworded and added a new citation Approved

Issue 9. Moved the LA Times sources to before the names. Approved

Issue 13. Done Approved

Issue 15. I like citing multiple sources Approved

@Bgsu98: Done Olliefant (she/her) 17:46, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

User:Olliefant: There are still a few unresolved issues. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:43, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: responded Olliefant (she/her) 06:28, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Source review passed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 11:02, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

List of Billboard number-one country songs of 2025

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

As my current nom already has three supports I figure I am OK to start another one, so here is this year's list of U.S. country number ones. All 81 previous lists are already FLs and I hope this one will be able to join that list. I realise there are still four charts to go this year, but you know you can count on me to update the article :-) Some of the references are not archived but that's because the IABot is having issues again. Hopefully I will be able to archive the rest at some point..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:33, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• In the table, the scopes for the "Hot Country Songs", and "Country Airplay" should be "colgroup". This probably needs to be fixed for the previous years as well.
• The table caption should probably be "Chart histories" given that there are two charts.
• "second artist to top the chart as both a solo artist and as a member of a duo or group." A footnote saying that Tyler Hubbard was the first seems warranted.
• "Shaboozey's song held the top spot for the first six weeks of the year, taking its total run at number one to 33 weeks," comparable values should either all be in figures or all in words. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:33, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:05, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (11/25/25)

• This is probably a matter of personal preference, but I would remove the "the"s from phrases such as "the rapper BigXthaPlug", "the country singer Bailey Zimmerman", and "the pop singer Tate McRae".
  • I have been told in the past that the "the" needs to be included because otherwise it is a false title, which should be avoided in high-quality prose.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

  Even that article is conflicted on whether it's proper or not, but like I said, it's up to you. 😃 Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:34, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

• Other than that, the prose is good and I see no issues with the table. Since my only comment is merely a suggestion, I will go ahead and support right now.
• On an unrelated note, I have submitted a number of photos to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates if you'd be willing to drop by. I have never submitted anything there until now. Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:31, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
  • I've never reviewed anything there so am not really sure what the criteria are, but will take a look.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:57, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Octave

Source review: reviewed Special:Permalink/1324068923

• All sources are generally reliable, no problems here
• Politely suggest that, in an ideal world, references should have a standardised casing, but it's no biggie ;)
• I believe the standard name format for ref 1 is "McKinley, James C., Jr." in most referencing systems
  • Fixed! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
• Inconsistent archiving is mentioned in the nom statement; AGFing that this will be done
• Ref 6, should be single quotes inside double quotes
  • Fixed! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
• Spotchecks turned up no issues

Ping me when done; great work. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 14:22, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

@UpTheOctave!: - done! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:25, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

That was quick!! Happy to pass this source review. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 14:26, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Olliefant

• Ref 5 appears to be syndicated content from "The Grio" and should be marked as being "The Grio" and "via AOL"
• Ref 6 is titled "Chappell Roan's 'The Giver'..." with apostrophe, however, the article cited is titled "Chappell Roan’s “The Giver”" with quotation marks. Is there a reason for this?
• Linking is consistent
• Dates are consistent
• Spot checked the non subscription sources.
• Unrelated, I'd clarify the year of Hubbard's achievement to help give a scale of how rare it is for someone to do.

That's what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 02:05, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

• @Olliefant: - thanks for that review, all addressed I think! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:00, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

  Done Olliefant (she/her) 17:46, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

• @Olliefant: - can I confirm that that's a "support"? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:46, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

  Yeah that was a whoopsie on my part Olliefant (she/her) 22:00, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in Libya

Nominator(s): Tone 08:22, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

Libya has five WHS and three tentative sites. Standard style. I figured I will wait a bit with longer nominations still, this one is compact and should be easy to read. Tone 08:22, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• The alt-text for the locator image needs to be fixed.
• Alt-text needs to be added for the last image (the cave). -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:39, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

  Fixed, thanks! Tone 09:00, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

• Continuing...
• LPQY seems to be name of the Phoenician settlement that became Leptis Magna according to the source.
• "It was the birthplace of the Septimius Severus"
• wikilink Arab invasion in the Leptis manga description.
• "with three orders of columns" By order, I don't think you mean Classical order, since they all look the same to me. If you meant storey, then change "orders" to "levels".
• "Monuments in the city include the Greek temples of the 7th and 6th centuries BCE".
• That all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:28, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

Could you nominate Jordan's list next? I am trying to get a Featured topic on the Arab States. Either way, I will put you as conominator because you did the majority of the work

• File:Leptis Magna Theatre.jpg PD
• File:Archaeological Site of Sabratha-108976.jpg CC BY-SA 3.0 igo
• File:Temple of Zeus - Cyrene.jpg CC BY 2.0
• File:Tadrart Acacus 1.jpg PD
• File:Old Ghadames (5282815851).jpg CC BY 2.0
• File:Girza,Libia.jpg PD
• File:Ptolemais (5283376622).jpg CC BY 2.0

File:Haua Fteah cave (half cropped).jpg CC BY 3.0

• "Ghadames was removed from this list " could be misinterperted as it was delisted as a whs
• "instability due to "→"instability caused by" stronger, more varied
• "post and"→"post, and"
• "and later Roman"→"and, later, Roman" later is interrupting, can be confused later Romans in time (both instances)
• "the Greek temples of the 7th and 6th centuries"→"6th− and 7th–century Greek temples" concise, chronological
• link Temple of Zeus to Temple of Zeus, Cyrene, move citations to preceding sentence
• "into very distinct" remove very
• "changes of"→"changes in"
• "the way of life of the locals"→"local way of life" ('the' not included for other items in list)
• "styles that reflect"→"styles. They reflect" (big sentence flow, maybe run-on)
• "of savanna"→"of the savanna" I usually hear "the savanna", 'a' might be acceptable here
• delete "finally on"
• "depict large"→"depict the large"
• "It has been occupied since at least the late 1st millennium BCE and was serving"→"Being occupied since at least the late 1st millenium BCE, it served" for flow, was serving is less encyclopedic and strange in this context.
• "its unique architecture"→"its own unique architectural style"
• "feature are"→"feature is" subject-verb agreement
• "houses where the"→"houses. The"
• Please clarify what ground floor vs. first floor is, as these terms are used interchangeably in certain english-speaking regions.
• "by Arab"→"from Arab"
• "Listed as endangered in 2016 due to the conflict in the country at that time, wildfires and torrential rain, it was removed from the list in danger in 2025 due"→It was listed as endangered in 2016, due to the civil conflict, wildfires and torrential rain, later being removed in 2025, due
• "list in danger" link to List of World Heritage in Danger and rephrase to "list of World Heritage in Danger"
• "c. 200 CE"→"around 200 CE" circa is usually only used in infoboxes, english is preferable
• "well preserved"→"well–preserved" merriam webster
• "and numerous monuments"→"and numerous monuments remaining"
• link Roman engineering to Ancient Roman technology
• "14 m (46 ft) deep" this should be 14 metre-deep, compound adjective
• "tools of from"→"tools from"
• beginning of farming link to Neolithic Revolution
• humid periods link to African humid period

Image review pass, might be inactive sorry if my reply is late

• Thanks for the comments, I agree with all. Any chance you help me with editing the article like the previous time (busy IRL :/) I will nominate Jordan next, deal! --Tone 09:41, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Support on prose User:Easternsahara_{review this} 00:40, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Michael Aurel

• Some of the sentences in the lead's first paragraph have quite a few parentheses. If possible, I'd recommend trying to move some of this information into the article's main text or otherwise performing some reworking here.
• consists of monuments – Perhaps link monument?
  • Monument is a very basic concept, it is expected that someone knows what that it is and we do not link obvious things
    • I think you could argue it's a term that is "particularly relevant to the context in the article", which is a caveat in WP:OL (cf. Cultural heritage, for instance), but I'll leave this one to your discretion. – Michael Aurel (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• Natural features (consisting ... are defined as natural heritage. – I'd suggest reworking this sentence so that it begins in "Natural heritage includes ..." (or similar) for parallelism and so that the reader understands what we're listing from the outset.
  • Personally, I disagree, the good thing about parentheses is that the reader can skip over them and they list things very well.
• Libya accepted the convention on 13 October 1978 – I would either move this sentence to before the definitions of natural and cultural heritage or I would restate the convention's full name, as "the convention" is here referring to something mentioned a few sentences back.
  • The reader must know what the convention that Libya signed entails before this sentence has any meaning to them. Also, since we're on a list about World Heritage Sites, it is very obvious that this is the World Heritage Convention.
• a further three on the tentative list – Hmm, is "the tentative list" an official title? If so, I would think it should be capitalised.
  • It is not.
    • Hmm, looking at UNESCO's page on the matter, they seem to treat it as though it's a title, or at least they consistently capitalise both words of the phrase ("Tentative Lists"). – Michael Aurel (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• All five sites are listed due to their cultural significance. – Hasn't this more or less already been said (or at least implied) above?
  • No, there are three types of World Heritage Sites, natural sites, cultural sites, and mixed sites. This is explained in the first paragraph.
    • I see what's meant now. This hasn't really been explained, though: we state that World Heritage Sites are "of importance to cultural or natural heritage", and we define those two terms. I think the reader could be forgiven for interpreting the sentence as a generic statement that "The sites are culturally significant", without piecing together that "cultural significance" here refers to specific criteria for a site's inclusion on grounds of cultural heritage. – Michael Aurel (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• In 2025, the List of World Heritage in Danger – This was linked in the previous sentence. I'd suggest either including the full name there or otherwise removing one of the links.
  • Done
    • Ghadames was no longer endangered, – I'd suggest "Ghadames was no longer classified as endangered" (or similar) – Michael Aurel (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• was founded as a Phoenician settlement LPQ – What does "LPQ" mean here?
  • Unsure, pinging User:Tone
• and came under the Romans in 46 BCE. – "came under Roman control", perhaps?
  • Changed control to rule, but done
• birthplace of the Septimius Severus. – omit "the"
  • Done
• I'd include some dates for Septimius Severus.
• After becoming the Emperor – link Roman emperor, remove "the", and remove capitalisation
  • Linked roman emperor, kept "the" per WP:FALSETITLE Sure its not a part of MOS, but it improves clarity which the MOS encourages
    • For a phrase to be a false title, it needs to come before the person's name: "convicted bomber" isn't a false title unless it's part of "convicted bomber Timothy McVeigh". On the use of "emperor" specifically, compare Roman emperor: "When a given Roman is described as becoming emperor in English, ...". – Michael Aurel (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• he rebuilt and enlarged the city and made it one of the most – Avoid the repetition of "and". Perhaps use a comma after "city" and then start from there with "transforming" or "turning" (or similar).
  • Don
• of the Roman world. – link Roman Empire
  • Done
• It was pillaged in the 4th century, – By whom?
• was pillaged in ... reconquered by ... and was finally abandoned following – no "was" for parallelism
  • Done
    • One additional point: and abandoned following the Arab invasion. – I'd add a link here and some dates, as we do below. – Michael Aurel (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• Founded as ... and then part of – This doesn't work grammatically.
  • Changed
    • This is an improvement. I'll put another beat on my drum about including dates, though, and once they're included it might be better to split the sentence. – Michael Aurel (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• Sabratha got absorbed – "was" is preferable in formal writing.
  • done
• absorbed in the Roman province of Africa in 46 BCE. – "absorbed into"
  • done
• It was prospering in the 2nd and 3rd centuries – "It prospered"
  • done
• the 2nd and 3rd centuries when numerous monuments – "during which"
  • done
• including a theatre with three orders of columns – By "order", are we referring to the subject of this article?
• Its fortunes turned in the 4th century with the decline in trade. – I'd excise the expression "fortunes turned", and explain where or with whom trade declined.
• the Byzantines until – "Byzantines, before"
  • done
• after the Arab invasions between the 7th and 11th centuries. – I'm not sure the use of two temporal indicators ("after", "between") works so well here. Maybe write "of the 7th and ..."?
• It was a major city of the Hellenistic and, later, Roman world. – I'd try to include a bit more detail here. "world" should also be plural.
• the Jewish revolt in 116 – "of"
  • done
• It's worth noting that the last date mentioned before 116 is 631 BCE. Is there any reason to not write this as "116 CE" (and to perhaps do so across the page), to avoid ambiguity?
  • done
    • Not compulsory, but any reason to not do this across the page, since we oscillate between BCE and CE dates a handful of times? – Michael Aurel (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• with the massive 365 earthquake – "the" seems to imply we're using a proper name or that the reader should already be familiar with this event.
  • done, unpiped link to be more descriptive
• the city include 6th− and 7th–century – use hyphens
• 6th− and 7th–century Greek temples, – link Ancient Greek temple
  • done
    • The link should be around just "Greek temples". – Michael Aurel (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• The rock paintings and engravings in the Acacus Mountains – Worth noting that the entries up until now haven't relinked the site's name in the "Description" column.
• were created over thousands of years, from 12,000 BCE to 100 CE. – "over thousands of years" is probably redundant, given we've supplied dates which convey the same thing with more precision.
  • removed
• They reflect the changes – By "they", do you mean the phases?
• during and after the African humid period – Per MOS:NOFORCELINK, I would give some indication of when this was.
• Being occupied since at least the late 1st millenium BCE, – "Being" can be omitted.
  • done
• The town has developed its own unique architectural style, adjusted to the harsh desert climate. – What sort of time period are we talking about here? "has" makes it sound as though we might be talking about architecture of recent times.
  • removed has
• next floor is for families, – "is living space", perhaps?
• has the nickname "the Pearl of the Desert" from Arab sources. – Which sources? From when?
• on the List of World Heritage in Danger, in 2016 – The comma can be omitted.
  • done
• due to the civil conflict, – Which civil conflict?
• List of World Heritage in Danger, – I'd try to rework things so we don't need to repeat the full title.
• Tentative list – Per above, I wonder if the full term should be capitalised? (This applies below as well.)
  • no
• In addition to sites inscribed on the World Heritage List, – "inscribed" implies physical etching of some nature; I'm not sure it's the right word here.
  • From merriam webster, "to enter on a list : enroll"
    • I see, Oxford Languages marks this as an archaic usage, though the OED apparently doesn't agree (and we'd be better off following the latter). Happy to retract this. – Michael Aurel (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• list of tentative sites that they may consider for nomination. – The use of "they" makes it sound a bit as though Libya itself is the one considering them for nomination.
• Libya maintains three properties – "has three sites", perhaps?
  • has kinda implies that these are permanent, but they are removed if they fail, if the state party wants to withdraw them, or if they are inscribed. maintain is better here
    • One can say "I have your keys", for example, without implying that the possession is permanent. To me, the word "maintains" here implies this sort of maintenance. – Michael Aurel (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
• The remains of the settlement are well–preserved, – hyphen
  • done
• It illustrates the adaptation – "it" doesn't have a clear antecedent here.
• with aspects such as water management. – "aspects" of what?
• The findings in the two extensive necropolises demonstrate a dynamic interchange between the Romans and the local populations. – If possible, I'd try to be a bit more specific. What was being interchanged between the two groups?
• It was one of the five important cities that formed the Pentapolis of Cyrenaica. – I would omit "important", as otherwise it could sound as though there were other, unimportant cities that were part of the Pentapolis.
  • done
• during the Hellenistic and later Roman periods – A bit of a nitpick, but "later" could make it sound as though we're talking about "later Roman periods" as opposed to some earlier Roman periods.
  • encased in commas to prevent confusion
• Actually, to go one step further, I would be explicit about the time periods we're referencing here, as some readers won't know the dates of the Hellenistic period, for example.
• periods and in the 4th century surpassed Cyrene that was damaged by earthquakes. – I'd suggest some rewriting here. In what regard did it surpass Cyrene?
• The remains of the city illustrate the cohabitation of different faiths and cultures. – "document", or "reveal", perhaps? The word "illustrate" initially led me think we might be leading into a broader point.
• Monuments from different time periods have been preserved, including a unique type of a mausoleum. – To what period or culture did this mausoleum belong? I'd cut the first part of the sentence (and include a little more detail), or try to rework it so it's saying something more concrete.
• the Middle Paleolithic, stone blades from the Upper Paleolithic, – Similar to some suggestions above, it might be a good idea to give the reader a more precise idea of when these periods were.
• includes traces of ... stone flake tools from ... stone blades from ... the beginning of farming – The last item in this list doesn't cohere with the others.
• 10,000-7000 years ago – endash
  • done
• including the African humid periods ("green Sahara") – Hmm, where is this quote coming from?
• It also provides a record of ... which allowed people to cross what is today a desert. – It sounds a bit as though the records were what allowed people to do the crossing.

All in all, it's a pleasant and interesting read. The only concerns are some fairly minor points of grammar and clarity. I'll let you get a handle on these prose suggestions, and then I'll do a few spot checks just to make sure everything's in order in that regard. – Michael Aurel (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

@Tone: my first ping of you didn't work, I tried addressing what I could. User:Easternsahara_{review this} 02:50, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

List of 2025 Indian Premier League personnel changes

Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 03:17, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

I am back after 4/5 months with a new FLC (with plenty of more lists for a few consecutive months), here is the list of auction and personnel changes from the 2025 Indian Premier League, the 18th edition of the Indian Premier League (IPL), a professional Twenty20 (T20) cricket league held in India, organized by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). Vestrian24Bio 03:17, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "It is held annually since the first edition in 2008" => "It has been held annually since the first edition in 2008"
• "₹120 crore (US$14 million), highest in the history of IPL" => "₹120 crore (US$14 million), the highest in the history of IPL"
• "surpassing ₹26.75 crore (US$3.2 million) paid" => "surpassing the ₹26.75 crore (US$3.2 million) paid"
• "Vaibhav Sooryavanshi became the youngest player sold in the IPL history" => "Vaibhav Sooryavanshi became the youngest player sold in IPL history"
• "notably West Indies tour of Ireland, West Indies tour of England and World Test Championship final" => "notably the West Indies' tour of Ireland, the West Indies' tour of England and the World Test Championship final"
• "The six players could consist of a maximum of five capped players" - link capped
• "Franchises who did not retain the maximum number of players, were allowed" - no reason for that comma
• "Any player willing to play in the IPL were required to register for the auction" => "Any player willing to play in the IPL was required to register for the auction"
• "Any auctioned player withdrawing before the season without legitimate reason or injury, would be banned" - no reason for that comma
• "Any Indian capped player who wasn't named" => "Any Indian capped player who had not been named"
• "Each playing member (including the impact player) " - this is the first mention of an "impact player". Can you explain it somehow?
• Name columns in the Support staff changes support based on forename eg Adam Griffith sorts under A. They should sort based on surname
• Same for the withdrawn players table -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: All done. Vestrian24Bio 10:38, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:45, 25 November 2025 (UTC)

Older nominations

List of Billboard Adult Contemporary number ones of 2001

Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

With the recent promotion of both the 1999 and 2000 lists, here's the next in the sequence. This year, a couple of songs which came to be associated in the public's minds with the 9/11 attacks got to number one and it's weird to think that was now nearly 25 years ago. Feedback as ever will be most gratefully received and acted upon as fast as humanly possible. I haven't archived the references as the IABot is playing up again - last time I checked the estimated run time was FIVE DAYS! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:28, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (11/21/25)

Note: This was originally posted as a quick comment: Just one suggestion, but I'll come back to this later. I would mention that "There You'll Be" is from the Pearl Harbor soundtrack. Similarly to how you noted that "My Heart Will Go On" was from Titanic a few lists back. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:15, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

I either forgot that or didn't realise it in the first place. I've added it now -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

In the lead, I would uniform the numbers to be all written out ("four weeks" vis a vis "10 weeks") since they are being used to make comparisons. I also added a missing comma for you. Everything else, including the table, looks good! Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:09, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98:, which numbers would you say that covers? I presume not "In the last quarter of the year, two songs which came.....", for example -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:36, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

You have "four occasions", "four weeks", and "six non-consecutive weeks". Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:39, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

I've changed the last two. The first one is not making any sort of comparison so I don't believe that applies..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:13, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Personally, I would spell them all out. But that's ultimately up to you. Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:29, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Sorry, I misread your comment, I thought you wanted them all as numbers. I'm going to change them all to words -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:08, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy284

• "After being displaced from the top spot for a week, it returned to number one for one more week, giving it a final total of 13 weeks in the top spot (12 weeks in 2001)." Comparable values near one another should be all spelled out or all in figures, even if one of the numbers would normally be written differently per MOS:NUMNOTES.
• "12 weeks at number one split across four spells atop the chart.": "at number one" and "atop the chart" mean the same thing.
• The table is missing its caption.
• That's all I got. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:03, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824: - many thanks for your review. All addressed, hopefully -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:18, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:59, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Medxvo

• "was made into a made-for-television film in 2002" - per MOS:LINKCLARITY, I suggest "was made into a made-for-television film of the same in 2002" or "was made into a made-for-television film, The Christmas Shoes, in 2002"
• "two songs which came to be associated" / "video paying tribute to the victims of the attacks which went viral on the internet" / "another song which came to be associated" - I think "which" should be "that" here
• Source review
  • Sources are reliable and consistently formatted
  • Spot-checked refs 2, 4, 5, 13, 17, 20, 25, 29, 33, 39, 42, 46, 50, 56, 59 - no issues
  • I suggest linking The Boot to The Boot (website) and removing the publisher parameter (Townsquare Media), since an article for the website could be created later and the wikilink would be beneficial. I also suggest linking Billboard to Billboard (magazine) for consistency

That's all :-) Medxvo (talk) 21:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

@Medxvo: - many thanks for your review. All done, I think -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Happy to support the FLC and pass the source review. Medxvo (talk) 19:55, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

List of capromyids

Nominator(s): PresN 15:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Hey all, mammal list #65 in our perpetual series and rodent list #10: Capromyidae. This is our second-to-last list covering the Caviomorpha parvorder, aka "things shaped kinda like guinea pigs", with the hutias, which look like giant guinea pigs with tails. It's an odd list with 10 living species in the Caribbean and 8 extinct ones, largely because, as the extinct species lived on smaller islands, when Europeans brought Old World rats over on their ships starting in the 1500s, the hutias got out-competed and had nowhere to go to get away. 6 of the remaining species are endangered or critically endangered as well, so as a whole this family isn't doing so hot. As always, the list reflects the scientific consensus as well as the results of prior FLCs. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 15:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "two species—the Jamaican coney and eared hutia—are categorized as an endangered species" => "two species—the Jamaican coney and eared hutia—are categorized as endangered species"
• That sentence is very long, I would be tempted to break it into two and have the bit about extinct species as a separate sentence
• That's it. Great work as ever! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:32, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Done, thanks for reviewing! --PresN 12:28, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:28, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Quick comment

Just a quick comment, but I'll come back to this later. I would include mention of the dagger symbol (that it signifies extinct species) to just above the tables where they're found. As it is now, mention of the dagger only occurs several sections higher. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:18, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Thing is, the daggers aren't just down in the tables, but also in the list in "Classification", right after "Conventions" explains them. I've added a hover-on of "Extinct", though, which was intended but wasn't working. --PresN 17:05, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "The 10 extant species of Capromyidae are divided into two subfamilies: Capromyinae, containing nine species in four genera" Comparable values near one another should be all spelled out or all in figures per MOS:NUMNOTES.
• Similar issue in the classification section. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:47, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• @MPGuy2824: Both done, thanks for reviewing! --PresN 12:54, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:36, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Octave

Source review: reviewed Special:Permalink/1323221165

• I genuinely can't find anything to fault here: great work! This is a pass on sourcing from me. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 14:29, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Image review

• File:Capromys pilorides.jpg CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Demarest's hutia.jpg PD
• File:Capromys Map.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 no source for info
• File:Hutia - Geocapromys ingrahami - NHMI.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Geocapromys ingrahami.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 no source for info, no explanation of color coding (one island is more pink)
• File:Geocapromys brownii Harvard University small.jpg CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Geocapromys brownii Map.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 sources, legendless
• File:Geocapromys thoracatus (Harvard University).JPG PD
• File:CapromysMelanurusSmit.jpg PD
• File:Mesocapromys melanurus Map.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 sourceless
• File:Mesocapromys angelcabrerai.jpg PD
• File:Mesocapromys angelcabrerai Map.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 meaning of green vs. red? sourceless
• File:Mesocapromys nana Map.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 no source
• File:Mesocapromys auritus Map.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 no source, 3 colors no explanation
• File:Mesocapromys sanfelipensis drawing.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Mesocapromys sanfelipensis Map.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 no source, why's it pink and not red?
• File:Capromys prehensilis (Harvard University).JPG PD
• File:Mysateles prehensilis Map.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 no source
• File:Hexolobodon phenax.jpg CC0
• File:Isolobodon.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Original-scientific-illustration-of-Plagiodontia-aedium-from-Cuvier-1836-showing.png PD
• File:Plagiodontia aedium.jpg CC BY-SA 4.0 no source
• File:Plagiodontia ipnaeum, holotype 2 (2).jpg CC0
• I would like an explanation on the article itself as to what the red vs. pink vs. green means. I'd also like for legends for the images be added to the image description on commons. Also please add sources for these maps

• @Easternsahara: Removed all of the unsourced maps, which I guess is all of the map images. They're all by the same editor, so I've left them a request on Commons to please put the source of their maps on their images; I'm pretty sure that it's the IUCN maps, but I can't prove that. --PresN 15:30, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

• Pass but please remove the text "range maps are provided..." because there are no range maps User:Easternsahara_{review this} 22:46, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Geographical indications in Ukraine

Nominator(s): Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 15:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Unlike my previous nominations, I made this list entirely from scratch, but it turned out quite well (much shorter than List of Ukrainian placenames affected by derussification or List of Intangible Cultural Heritage elements in Ukraine, so don't hesitate to review). Also, to my knowlege, this is the first list of geographical indications / protected products to be nominated. I believe it is well-structured and properly formatted, and thus ready to be nominated. As always, improvements are welcome. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 15:40, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• Using the word "dupes" feels a bit weird to me. See if imitation or replica conveys enough of the same meaning. Keep the wikilink though.

• Changed to "imitation goods", tell me if that works.

• protection of geographical indications is was established

• Done

• "other products, including handicrafts, may receive the status as well" to "other products, including handicrafts, have received the status as well"

• Done

• Can "Frumushika" be wikilinked somewhere?

• I have interlanguage links to Frumushika River in two descriptions in the table. Do you also want me to link it in the lead?

  Yes, please. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

  Done

• "Area of origin is located within"

• Done

• wikilink "rosé"

• Done

• " with no more than 20% mountain cow's or goat's milk added.": a bit of repetition. Maybe change it to something like "with the rest being cow or goat milk." Similar issue for "Hutsul cow bryndza"

• Done

• Consider having a separate symbol and color for elements that are also on the "Intangible Cultural Heritage of Ukraine" list

• I've considered that before but ultimately decided not to do it. If I remember correctly, my reasoning was that this wouldn't cover many items (only three), and if I also have a separate color for the UNESCO list specifically, that would further divide that into two and one. The National Register of Intangible Cultural Heritage doesn't get updated very often (usually once in a few months), and of 117 items currently inscribed, only 3 are also registered as GIs, so I wouldn't expect the overlap to widen significantly as both registers expand. I mentioned this information in the descriptions to show that these items are protected not only as products on the market, but also as traditions. While I believe that this information is worth mentioning, I don't think it's important enough to highlight it with a separate symbol and color. If the overlap was bigger, though, I would consider this important enough. I'm not strongly committed to keeping it as is though, so if you think it still makes sense to mark the ICH elements, I can do that.

• since the table is sortable, you'll have to wikilink things multiple times if they appear for different elements, since you aren't sure which of the row will appear on top.

• Added links. Tell me if more are needed.

• I'll continue this in a day or two. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
• Continuing ...
• Replace autochthonous with indigenous OR native.

• Done

• I think "titrated acidity" can be shortened to just acidity

• Done, but should I keep the wikilink?

  Keep the link. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:41, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• The ref pdfs are images, which means that I cannot copy the text to google translate and check, but there are quite a few uses of "unique" and "distinctive" used throughout the table that would be considered PUFFERY IMO. If the refs do use similar words, then they might be ok.

• Yes, the sources often use words "характерний" and "особливий" (unique/distinctive), "неповторність" (uniqueness), etc. I think this is justified in this case because the entire point of GI labels is to protect products that have special characteristics.

  Makes sense. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:41, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

• Wikilink Bessarabia.

• Done

• "it disappeared in most of the region" to "it disappeared from most of the region"

• Done

• I'm not sure what "sunlight more scattered and intense" means in this context, but to me those two adjectives are near-antonyms.

• That's what the sources say... I understand the scattering part, as the light scatters once it is reflected by the water. I'm not so sure about the intensity, but, as I understand, the light can be spread out (scattered) but still bright (intense). I can't comment on the physics behind this, especially considering the different definitions of light intensity.

• No issues that I could see with table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:32, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 Thanks for the review. I have replied to all your comments. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 11:29, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

  According to [1] the direct sunlight is scattered, while the reflected sunlight (from water surfaces) is more intense than normal. Only incorporate that if you can find a good way to do it.

  Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:39, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks for the support.

  At least in the original wording, direct sunlight is not mentioned, and it may be interpreted that both "reflected" and "scattered" refer to the same sunlight, although you may be right that they do not. But I agree that this is confusing, so I removed the mention of scattered sunlight. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 09:57, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

List of British monarchs

Nominator(s): JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 00:10, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

My second FLC and this is one I've been working on for quite a while now. I am hoping that this will complete a featured topic of all the British monarchs, so it is quite a cool final piece of the puzzle I am putting in. I've tried to do all of the required accessibility measures already but please let me know if I've missed anything. Thanks, JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 00:10, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Doesn't this page violate Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Accessibility/Data_tables_tutorial#Avoiding_column_headers_in_the_middle_of_the_table? I'm also asking this to learn what is and isn't allowed :) Dajasj (talk) 14:14, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

It does; the table either needs to be split into multiple tables (1 per house), the house made into a column, or the house removed. Additionally, while the table coding has rowscopes, they're not actually marked as header cells- change | scope="row" to ! scope="row". --PresN 16:01, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

I also question the need for several of these columns to be sortable. The dates appear to sort by day (ie. the first digit the cell), which is of zero use. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:13, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure any of the columns need to be sortable – what order except chronological would you want. List of British monarchy records is the article for anything except chronological order. JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 21:06, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

• There's a reference at the end of the lead to the Untied Kingdom [sic] -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

  done JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 22:48, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose. The edit-war over the timeline demonstrates that the article is not stable, failing criterion 6. DrKay (talk) 22:17, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

  @DrKay If people who have not at all been involved with writing the article want to come by and revert to the old timeline without explanation, then I can't stop them. The two most recent edit summaries have been "let's bring the old timeline chart back" and "old timeline is better. If you want to change it, then I recommend we discuss about it in the talk page." I asked for semi-protection at WP:RPP/I due to what I considered persistent vandalism but the request was declined. Is it fair on me, having put hours into writing the article, that its FLC does not pass because people drive-by revert my work without explanation? FLC is about suggesting improvements, and there is literally nothing I can do about it, especially as these editors have not even started a talk page discussion on the matter. JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 22:52, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

  @DrKay I would consider the article stable now; I applied for semi-protection a little while ago as well but it was declined. No proper challenge to the new timeline chart has been established on the talk page. Would you consider changing your vote to neutral? JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 15:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

  One of the images is nominated for deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:His Majesty King Edward VIII in his Coronation Robes.jpg) and another was deleted previously (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen Elizabeth II Coronation Portrait Herbert James Gunn.jpg) and so is in danger of re-deletion. The royal cyphers column appears to be decorative and is not something usually found in lists of monarchs. One of the cyphers is not even of a British monarch. (It is of a Hanoverian elector.) The arms column is repetitive: one file is shown twice, two files are shown three times and one file is repeated five times. I therefore still have concerns over 'professional standard', scope, structure, visual appeal, style and image use. DrKay (talk) 21:56, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose on WP:FL?#6 (It is not the subject of ongoing edit wars). I agree with DrKay: it does not matter if the current version is objectively better, we cannot promote a list if it is not stable. From WP:EW: An editor who repeatedly restores their preferred version is edit warring, regardless of whether those edits are justifiable. As such, I don't think you were reverting vandalism, so believe it is not covered under WP:3RRNO. Furthermore, although you say "these editors have not even started a talk page discussion on the matter", we can assume that 2601:40A:8400:1820:0:0:0:0/64 is the same person, in which case they did try and start a WP:BRD cycle on the talk page over a week ago. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 14:44, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

  I have initiated a discussion on the talk page and am happy to escalate this to dispute resolution or a request for comment as appropriate. Do you think it's okay if the FLC is continued as the normal length of an FLC (at least a month for a big article) is likely longer than the resolution process for the timeline (I'm not asking you to change your !vote)? Can I also just clarify if you are saying whether 2601:40A:8400:1820:0:0:0:0/64 is the same person as ~2025-32665-37 or Richie1509? JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 17:50, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

  Thank you for reaching out on the talk page: I have replied there. Honestly? It's really up to the delegates whether it's appropriate to continue the FLC at this point. In my eye, the crux of the matter is whether an article is stable or not. Until this dispute is resolved, I still believe it fails #6. As for the IP, I was meaning that Special:Diff/1320219858 and Special:Diff/1319912398 are clearly by the same individual. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 18:00, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

  @UpTheOctave! I would consider the article stable now; I applied for semi-protection a little while ago as well but it was declined. No proper challenge to the new timeline chart has been established on the talk page. Would you consider changing your vote to neutral? JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 15:39, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

  I disagree that no proper challenge to the new timeline chart has been established on the talk page. After all, several editors raised mobile accessibility issues introduced with your changes, but I digress: the issues raised seem resolved now, so I've struck my !vote. Best, UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 18:51, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Grand Prix of Figure Skating Final

Nominator(s): Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:39, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating was just promoted to Featured List today, so now I will be submitting the individual Grand Prix events. Grand Prix de France (figure skating) has already been promoted. Here is the Grand Prix Final. All of the results have been verified and sourced, the tables should be properly formatted, and the sources should be properly formatted. I look forward to your constructive feedback or suggestions. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:39, 8 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• Stellar work as ever. The only thing I would suggest is to merge the two paragraphs about COVID together, as the first is only two sentences and doesn't really need to stand alone. Oh, and I think "that is, in a cluster made up exclusively of individuals who have been thoroughly tested and unlikely to spread infection" should just be "that is, a cluster made up exclusively of individuals who have been thoroughly tested and unlikely to spread infection"
• That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:29, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

•  Done Bgsu98 (Talk) 09:11, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:15, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

  User:ChrisTheDude: Thank you! I also have this article at FAC if you are so inclined. It's like pulling teeth to get any attention there. Bgsu98 (Talk) 20:53, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review

• Only one problem that I could see: In the "Most gold medals by skater" tables, the scope for the header cells which span multiple rows should be "rowgroup". e.g. 4, 8 and 10 in the women's singles table. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:54, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

User:MPGuy2824: Fixed, thank you! Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:29, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Support on prose and accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:20, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

List of Intangible Cultural Heritage elements in Palestine

Nominator(s): User:Easternsahara_{please review this and this} 17:41, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Palestine has 8 Intangible Cultural Heritage elements. While it does have a national heritage register, this documents things that are tangible (monuments, buildings, etc.) so I have not included it like the Ukraine list does. Otherwise, it is modeled very similarly to the Ukraine list, with its citations and table format. User:Easternsahara_{please review this and this} 17:41, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Shwabb1

I'm happy to see another ICH list nomination; I think these are very underrated compared to World Heritage Sites.

• Palestine does have a national ICH list, as its existence is necessary for the nomination of these items to the UNESCO lists. For example, this is confirmed in the nomination file for the art of embroidery in Palestine (docx, scroll down to section 5. Inclusion of the element in an inventory). While you don't have to list out all the elements on the national list, I think its existence is worth mentioning. There should be some external sources about it, but if you really can't find any, maybe you can cite a few of the nomination files as all of them have to mention the national list.
• Use Template:Langx for the Arabic-language text in the lead
• I've edited the "Background" section to improve flow and reduce repetition (as well as a few other smaller changes), see if you agree with everything.
• Consider changing "Due to the sustenance that Date palm has provided to Arab world, many associated, historically significant, cultural practices have been fostered" to "Many historically significant cultural practices associated with the Date palm have been fostered in the Arab world due to its sustenance" or something similar. It's better if "cultural practices" are the subject of the sentence as they are the focus of the description.
• I think the "Other intangible cultural heritage" section can be removed as it's too short. The content can be integrated into the lead and the "Background" section instead. The on-going nominations can be moved to the lead for sure, as I did in the Ukrainian list.
• I may go through the text in more detail later but that's it for now.

Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 21:53, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Putting this here so no one thinks that I've abandoned this nomination, I've done everything except for the national register part. I'm finding sources on that right now User:Easternsahara_{review and this} 03:08, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

I've looked through the list one more time and applied a few more fixes. Last problem I noticed is that some sources need to be archived. Ping when you're done with everything. Thanks. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 09:15, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

@Shwabb1: I have only found this source which appears to be derived from a governmental list, though a bit dated. Can I use this to make the national register on the article? I could really not find anything else and I checked Arabic, English and French User:Easternsahara_{review this} 03:31, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

I see. If there really aren't any sources for the full, up-to-date list, then you don't have to expand the list itself, but you should still mention its existence in the lead (something like the first sentence of the second paragraph in the Ukrainian list). It's important to mention that the creation of the national register is required by the Convention before the elements can be nominated further to the UNESCO lists, and the Wafa source + text of the Convention (currently ref 2) should be sufficient for this purpose. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 07:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Lajmmoore

Fantastic to see this list nominated - I started the article way back and I've really enjoyed seeing it expand. For review:

• question - the article states Arabic kohl is due to be inscribed in 2025 - but we are almost at the end of the year, so I wondered whether this reuires an update?

Not yet, this doesn't show Arabic kohl on the list, and it shows it as an ongoing nomination. I'll update it when it is inscribed

• To clear this up a bit: "The twentieth session of the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage will take place from Monday 8 to Saturday 13 December 2025." Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 09:16, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

• comment I think some references are duplicated at the bottom - this might be worth checking:

• https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/palestinian-hikaye-00124 in refs: 6, 28 (84%)
• https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/the-art-of-embroidery-in-palestine-practices-skills-knowledge-and-rituals-01722 in refs: 7, 30 (90%)
• https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/date-palm-knowledge-skills-traditions-and-practices-01902 in refs: 9, 31 (84%)
• https://doi.org/10.1080%2F19452829.2021.2019690 in refs: 17, 21 (95%)

Otherwise I made some copy edits to the text and added some hyperlinks. Lajmmoore (talk) 08:47, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your copyedits and linking, I have consolidated all the references. @Lajmmoore: User:Easternsahara_{review and this} 16:34, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

support I think it's in very good shape now Lajmmoore (talk) 18:23, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• "Its subsequent inscription to the UNESCO lists". I think the "its" is referring to cultural heritage elements (mentioned in prev sentence), in which case it should be replaced by "Their".
• "lifeway" -> "way of life"
• Since "Arabic Kohl" was added to the list, that part of the sentence in the Background section can be removed and a mention can be added in the lead.
• "The use of expressive language, emphasis, speech rhythms, vocal inflections, use of the Palestinian dialect, and other good story-telling techniques are defining features of the Palestinian hikaye" -> "The use of the Palestinian dialect, and good story-telling techniques including expressive language, emphasis, speech rhythms and vocal inflections are defining features of the Palestinian hikaye"
• "numerous different motifs". I think that is already implied.
• "became an art form present in marble and wood carving, embroidery, and metal etching, among other art forms." -> "came to be included in marble and wood carving, embroidery, and metal etching, among other art forms." Avoiding repeated use of "art form"
• "Traditionally, the Qalam, writing instrument," -> "Traditionally the writing instrument, known as the Qalam,"
• "including marital status, socioeconomic status," -> "including marital and socioeconomic status,"
• "performed by eleven dancers," - the picture shows 12 people (maybe the leader isn't counted as part of the eleven). Either skip the word eleven, or use a different picture, like say File:Palestinian girls dancing Dabke.jpg.
• "It is harvested twice a year" You can be more specific and say that the leaves are harvested.
• wikilink "eyeliner"
• expand (at least a sentence more) the description of kohl: maybe something about their storage containers.
• No issues that I could find with accessibility. (please  mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

List of constituencies of the Jharkhand Legislative Assembly

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:23, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

The 9th in the Indian constituency series. I've improved the lead, including some history, and brought the table accessibility to FL-standards. Similar, recent FL: Rajasthan. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:23, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment - Modern featured lists do not start sections with "The following is a list of the", as it is tautological. Consider something like: There are x constituencies of the Jharkhand Legislative Assembly...." Mattximus (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

I didn't think it was a violation of MOS:THISISALIST since it wasn't in the lead, but I can see how it is redundant. I've removed it completely and moved the ref to the table caption. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:32, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Easternsahara

• File:Jharkhand Legislative Assembly.jpg - CC0 Needs alt which says see caption and i am pretty sure 300px is supposed to go in session_res =
• File:IN-JH.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Wahlkreise zur Vidhan Sabha von Jharkhand.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0

Otherwise the images look good, I may do other reviews on this article later -- Easternsahara

Fixed. I prefer to let the infobox template choose the image size, so I've only added alt text. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:39, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

Pass image review User:Easternsahara_{review and this} 03:36, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Its seat is at Ranchi, the capital of the state and it sits" => "Its seat is at Ranchi, the capital of the state, and it sits"
• "81 single-seat constituencies, who each directly elect a representative" => "81 single-seat constituencies, each of which directly elects a representative"
• "Jharkhand was formed in 2000, when the state of Bihar was split, after the passage of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000." => "Jharkhand was formed in 2000 when the state of Bihar was split after the passage of the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000."
• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:32, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Fixed all. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:46, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:47, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

List of presidents of the Maldives

Nominator(s): Unilandofma^Talk 09:12, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that this list meets all the criteria of FL and that it's a step in promoting articles related to the Maldives on Wikipedia. Unilandofma^Talk 09:12, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98

It seems there is a lot of information on the table that is unsourced. Bgsu98 (Talk) 10:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

What's unsourced? The sources in the table covers it. Unilandofma^Talk 11:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Is what is currently marked as source no. 11 cover everything on the table? Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:29, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Source no. 11 covers the list of former presidents. The sources marked on the presidents cover their rows respectively. Unilandofma^Talk 14:23, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

The second president on the table has no source anywhere in his row. Additionally, if you are using one source for all of the information in a particular row, then there should be a separate column for sources down the far right hand column. Otherwise, the presence of the source in only one cell implies that it is referencing only the contents of that one cell. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:12, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion, I added a separate column for the sources and added the source for the second president onto the article. Unilandofma^Talk 17:29, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

I have performed some minor copy edits to the lead. Bgsu98 (Talk) 21:20, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

User:Unilandofma: Several of your notes (c through g) are not full sentences, so they therefore shouldn't end with a period. I will try to do your source review later this evening when I get home from work. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

I removed the periods from the notes! Unilandofma^Talk 15:44, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Looking at the notes, if the word "president" is used as a title, then I believe it needs to be capitalized (ie. "President Yameen"). See President of the Maldives. Also, in notes C and G, you do not need the "the" in front of "Article 122". Per Constitution of the Maldives, "Constitution" should be capitalized in this context.

In note A, change the comma to a semicolon after "Monarchy restored".

Note D is awkwardly written. "Removed from power... by president Yameen by a vote taken..." Too many phrases starting with "by". Same with note E. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:10, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Additionally, the caption of the president does not need the term "the incumbent". Recommend simply "Mohamed Muizzu, President of the Maldives since 2023". Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:15, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Bgsu98, I've implemented the changes you recommended! Unilandofma^Talk 06:17, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

User:Unilandofma: It looks like you have a few instances of "vice President" as a result of converting lower-case to capital. Correct those to "Vice President" and I'll be happy to support this list. Bgsu98 (Talk) 12:27, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: I've corrected it to "Vice President". Unilandofma^Talk 14:22, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

• Support. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:47, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Image review

Here'll be an image review from me! Arconning (talk) 23:58, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Arconning, I added and fixed the sources on the images as well as added alt-text for accessibility. Unilandofma^Talk 02:55, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Pass Arconning (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

• File:Muliaage palace.jpg - CC BY 2.0
• File:The President's Office of Maldives.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Mohamed Amin.jpg - Public Domain, needing the source
• File:Ibrahim Muhammad Didi.png - Public Domain, source link needs to be fixed
• File:Ibrahim Nasir.png - CC BY 4.0
• File:Maumoon Abdul Gayoom Presidential Portrait 2000s (cropped).jpeg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Mohamed Nasheed portrait (2).jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Mohammed Waheed Hassan official portrait (cropped).jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Abdulla Yameen presidential portrait (cropped).jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Ibrahim Mohamed Solih official portrait.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Dr Muizzu in December 2023.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• All have relevant captions, all images needing alt-text for accessibility though.

Drive-by comment

• Why is one row coloured a sort of mustard colour? This is unexplained and is also an MOS:ACCESSIBILITY violation -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:35, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• To expand on Chris' point above, color should not be the only way to distinguish something: use a symbol (and a legend) too. See List of World Heritage Sites in Burkina Faso for an example of this.
• Use {{abbr|Ref.|Reference(s)}} as the header of the Ref column.
• The name column sortability needs to be based on last name. Use the {{sortname}} template.
• Tables need column scopes for all column header cells, which in combination with row scopes lets screen reader software accurately determine and read out the headers for each cell of a data table. Column scopes can be added by adding !scope=col to each header cell, e.g. ! Elected becomes !scope=col | Elected. If the cell spans multiple columns with a colspan, then use !scope=colgroup instead.
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• Try to use the same wikitext for the names in the Vice-president and president column, That way it is more obvious that there are commonalities between the columns. (please  mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

  Hi @MPGuy2824, thanks for your comments. I've implemented them into the article! Unilandofma^Talk 04:52, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

  • I think you should change the alt text for Ibrahim Muhammad's image. It makes it sound like he's still the acting president.
  • The {{Multiple image}} template isn't compatible with MOS:UPRIGHT. I suggest that you use separated images, one after the other. Alternatively, since you don't mention either of those buildings in the lead, you can replace these images with one of the incumbent president. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:39, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

    I've clarified the alt text on ibrahim Muhammad's image and I replaced the pictures in the lead with the portrait of the current president. Unilandofma^Talk 16:19, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

• Support on accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• The lead image caption is not a sentence so it should not have a full stop
• "when president Mohamed Amin Didi was nearly beaten to death.[6] After he died of his injuries....." - so apparently he was beaten to death.....?
• "President Mohamed Amin Didi was the shortest-serving president" => "Mohamed Amin Didi was the shortest-serving president"
• Sorting the first column puts the dash value at the top, meaning that it isn't possible to sort the table back into chronological order. Use a hidden sorting template so that the dash sorts between 1 and 2
• The vacant/abolished rows also need hidden sorting templates so that they sort in the right place
• Note d should not have a full stop
• Nor should note e
• That's what I got :-) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:52, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

  Hi Chris! I implemented your comments to the article besides the ones you made about the table. Could you specify what you mean by a hidden sorting template as I have no idea what you mean by that. Thanks! Unilandofma^Talk 17:17, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

  I just went ahead and did it with this edit, as it was quicker than typing a long explanation. Now everything sorts in the right order -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

  Thanks! Unilandofma^Talk 15:22, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:39, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Source review (12/8/25)

This table checks 4 passages from throughout the article (22.2% of 18 total passages). These passages contain 6 inline citations (28.6% of 21 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:19, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Reference #	Letter	Source	Archive	Status	Notes
The president serves as the commander-in-chief of the Maldives National Defence Force and leads the cabinet of the country.
2		presidency.gov.mv	web.archive.org
3		presidency.gov.mv	web.archive.org
The monarchy was restored in another constitutional referendum the same year.
7		maldivesstory.com.mv	web.archive.org
Since 1968, two presidents (Ibrahim Nasir and Mohamed Nasheed) have resigned from the post.
10		bbc.com	web.archive.org		Source only confirms the resignation of Mohamed Nasheed; it says nothing of Ibrahim Nasir.
Appointed vice president under terms of the Article 122 of the constitution of the Maldives.
24		old.majlis.gov.mv	web.archive.org		I have no idea what this source is, because it is written in another language I don't recognize. Wikipedia's article simply calls it Maldivian language. The language code is dv, so I will add it to the citation.
25		presidency.gov.mv	web.archive.org

User:Unilandofma: There is only the one issue that needs to be addressed. Let me know once you have fixed it. Bgsu98 (Talk) 00:36, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I've fixed the issue. As for the old.majlis.gov.mv source, it's a sitee (letter) by then president Mohamed Waheed to the parliament speaker calling for a vote to OK his appointment of vice president Waheeduddin under Article 122 of the constitution. Unilandofma^Talk 00:51, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

It is multiple pages of scanned documents and IDs. You could clarify in the citation which page has the document to which you are referring. However, since the second source you cite verifies all of the information, it is not a big deal. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:05, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Source review passed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Timeline of the first Trump presidency (2017 Q1)

Nominator(s): Newbzy (talk) 08:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm nominating this article as it has now undergone a major overhaul by me.

I went through this article and extensively copyedited it, fixing spelling, grammar, punctuation and tone. The next biggest thing I focussed on was stopping names and job titles from being needlessly repeated, for example changing 'President Trump' to simply 'Trump' once the title was introduced (same for Mike Pence). For other people given a job title, I've made it so that their full name is introduced first, then after that their last name is only used. MOS:JOBTITLES was observed, and I've decapitalised titles where necessary.

For Wikilinking, I've ensured that the first instance of something is the only time it is linked, and any subsequent mentions of it are not. In terms of information, every dot point is sourced, with many being supported by multiple citations. There are only two days (Sunday, March 12 and Saturday, March 25) that do not have any events listed. This page is relatively stable; it hasn't been through any recent major edits before mine, though it did go through a couple of name changes earlier in the year.

I'm hoping this can pass the featured list criteria following my edits. Thank you in advance to those who choose to review this! Newbzy (talk) 08:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Olliefant

• Lead is way to short

 Fixed: it's been expanded.

• Everything after the lead sentence could be moved to "See also"

 Done.

• The "Economy and employment" image is missing a caption, a source, and alt text

 Comment: I ended up removing this image after I merged the 'economy and employment' section into the lead.

• Expand the "Public opinion" section

 Done.

• "[45th] [president of the United States]" and "[48th] [vice president]" are both MOS:SEAOFBLUE violations

 Fixed.

• Clarify that Trump and Pence took different oaths of office

 Done.

• Also Pence should be before Trump as the Veep is sworn in before the President

 Fixed.

• Under "Tuesday, February 14", "[Governor of New Jersey] [Chris Christie]" is a SEAOFBLUE violation, there is likely more like this on the page.

 Fixed, along with other linked 'Governor of [state] [person]' instances.

• Under "Friday, February 24", why is the NYT before the others? Also why aren't CNN and BBC italicized?

 Partly done: I've made it an alphabetical list. The BBC and CNN's names aren't italicised because the titles of the articles for them do not use italics.

• Under "Week 8" disambiguate "Democratic"

 Done.

• Did nothing happen on "Sunday, March 12"?

 Added: I also found something to add for Saturday, March 25.

• Under "Sunday, March 26", I'd link "American Israel Public Affairs Committee" instead of "(AIPAC)"

 Done.

• Missing any content on the First presidential transition of Donald Trump

 Added: the lead now has a dedicated paragraph.

That's what I found, ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 06:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

@Olliefant: completed. I've noted the changes I've made under each dot point (sorry to edit your post). Newbzy (talk) 04:14, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Support Olliefant (she/her) 04:22, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Drive-by comment

The lead does not fulfill its purpose of providing an overview of the article (it's literally just one sentence, which almost certainly violates WP:THISISALIST, and then a bunch of stuff which should be at the bottom under "see also"). But then you have an actual "overview" section to start off the body, which isn't an overview, because it only covers two very specific points......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: please see the changes I've made to the lead. It now has a paragraph about Trump's 2017 transition, two paragraphs about the content of the list itself, and a final paragraph merging the 'overview' section's content into one and elaborating on the public opinion of Trump during the quarter. Newbzy (talk) 05:31, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

I'll also add a drive-by comment here: what are the selection criteria for the list? Given how much coverage the American presidency will always receive, we probably need something to weed out the trivial stories from each day. RunningTiger123 (talk) 05:04, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

That's a good point, and it's probably a matter that would require consensus, as opposed to just me picking and choosing. I will say, though, that none of the listed events seem that trivial, especially as Trump's term and its actions were so controversial. Newbzy (talk) 09:05, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

My thoughts: an event should only be included here if (a) it is notable enough for its own article or (b) it received retroactive coverage, not just coverage at the time (or, if it's an event that wasn't public, not just when the details were made public). So for instance, the inauguration and the executive orders from January 20 would be good, but the changes to FHA premiums would not. But I wouldn't try to enforce that unless other reviewers agreed to similar criteria. RunningTiger123 (talk) 23:05, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

Octave

I'll conduct the source review for this behemoth of an article. Given the sheer size of the section (well over 400 references!), I'll break this review into three sections: reliability, consistency/formatting, and spotchecks. Once each section is done, we will move on to the next, before a final check. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 14:58, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

@Newbzy, just pinging in case you didn't see this. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 11:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Gosh, I do apologise, I wasn't monitoring this page! I'll start work on my sandbox of this article the first chance I get. Newbzy (talk) 02:35, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

Reviewed Special:Permalink/1321625081

Reliability

• What makes Ballotpedia a reliable source per WP:BALLOTPEDIA?

 Fixed: I replaced Source 4 with a The New York Times citation.

• What makes ref 27 (Google Docs) a reliable source?

 Fixed: Turns out this source wasn't even accessible. I found a USA Today citation to replace it and updated the information.

• What makes Business Insider a reliable source per WP:BI?

 Fixed: I either replaced the citations with more reliable source(s), or else removed them because a successive footnote was adequate. The new citations came from The Washington Post, CNBC, The Guardian, CNN and Reuters.

• What makes ref 51 (a Forbes contributor) a reliable source per WP:FORBESCON?

 Fixed: I replaced it with a The Indian Express citation.

• What makes this article from the Times of India a reliable source per WP:TIMESOFINDIA?

 Fixed: I replaced Source 58 with a CNN citation.

• What makes Fox News a reliable source for American politics per WP:FOXNEWSPOLITICS?

 Fixed: Citations removed or replaced with more reliable source(s). New cites came from ABC News, The Guardian, The New York Times, NPR, CNN, C-SPAN and Politico.

• What makes the Washington Times a reliable source for American politics per WP:WASHINGTONTIMES?

 Fixed: I replaced Source 126 with an ABC News citation and Source 312 with a CBS News citation.

• What makes the Boston Herald a reliable source for American politics?

 Fixed: I replaced Source 386 with a USA Today citation.

@UpTheOctave!: The problem cites have been corrected. Please see my annotations under each point you have raised.

Happy with above; couple extras:

• What makes WP:HUFFPOST a reliable source for American politics?
• As above, what makes Fox Business a reliable source for American politics?

 Completed: Citations replaced with sources by The Guardian and NPR.

Consistency

• Inconsistent citation style: you have a mix of CS1 and CS2 citations, which should be standardised
• Inconsistent use of archive links
• Politely suggest using a consistent casing for reference titles
• Inconsistent linking of publisher/work
• Inconsistent use of the url access parameter. Please include for all paywalled or subscription-walled sources
• Inconsistent use of ISSNs for periodicals

Satisfied with above. I've identified some larger issues with formatting consistency above; will move on to individual comments on sources once these are completed. UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 19:16, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

List of governors of Imo State

Nominator(s): Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

This is the list of governors of Nigeria's state of Imo from when the region was called Eastern then split into East Central and two other states, then East Central was splitted into Anambra and Imo states. I have significantly worked on this and it now meets the criteria for FL. Feedback would be very much appreciated. Thank you already.

Pinging History6042 who reviewed and passed images checks in the previous nom which was archived for lack of participation of reviewers. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• You'll need to use the upright param for the locator map image, instead of a pixel size (MOS:UPRIGHT).
• For the alt-text of the same map, don't describe what the image is; instead describe what the image shows. For this one it could be something like "Imo state is in the south of Nigeria".
• I'll continue with a prose review soon -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 thanks! I used upright now. Re alt text, is the current one not describing what the image "shows"? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:33, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

  My point was that the image is a "Map of Nigeria showing Imo State", but what you might have wanted a sighted person to notice is the relative location of the state within Nigeria. But, re-reading MOS:ALTMAP, it looks like "the colour, position, and size of elements are not important" for alt-text. @Easternsahara, since you pointed out this link to me, do you have thoughts on this? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:45, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

  Yes that is what the alt text should be according to ALTMAP "Imo state is in southern Nigeria" or something similar. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 12:23, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

  Okay, thanks! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 12:42, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

• Support on accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:01, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Image review

In return for VVF's review on the Arab WHS list User:Easternsahara_{please review this and this} 23:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

• File:Imo State Government.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0 No source, can you add a source that this is based off of (from website, image from official document, etc.) alt should be see caption
• File:Imo State Flag.svg - CC0 Alt should be see caption
• File:Nigeria - Imo.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Ndubuisi Kanu Portrait.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Admiral Adekunle Lawal.jpg - Fair use
• File:A portrait of Dr Samuel Mbakwe (Dee Sam).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Governor Rochas Okorocha (cropped).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Rt. Hon. Emeka Ihedioha (cropped).png - CC BY-SA 3.0
• Add birth and death date for Sunday Ajibade Adenihun which was 1939 and 2008

  @Easternsahara: Many thanks. Fixed alts. Source? The flag and insignia are clearly being used respectively in Imo State and related articles, see file pages. Adenihun's date of birth and death is unverifiable, no RS to confirm it. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

  Pass image review User:Easternsahara_{please review this and this} 05:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Before 1976, the area lay within the Eastern Region. After the regional system was dissolved on 27 May 1967" - is one of those dates a typo?
  • Whoops, good catch. It was supposed to be East Central State. Fixed. -VWF
• "However, following Nigeria’s first military coup in January 1966, the military abolished the regional system, dismissed civilian premiers, and appointed military administrators, with Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu governing the Eastern Region from January 1966 until its dissolution in May 1967" - if the region existed until 1967 then the regional system can't have been abolished in 1966
  • Good catch again. Fixed. -VWF
• "Administrators were usually appointed to rule a state when there is" - the tenses of the two verbs don't agree
  • Fixed. -VWF
• "as part of a nationwide restructuring executed by the military government of Murtala Mohammed" - almost identical wording appears in the previous section, there's no need to say it twice
  • Yeah, removed. -VWF
• "who initially contested in the 2011 election" => "who initially contested the 2011 election"
  • Fixed, with thanks. -VWF
• Because the "term in office" column isn't sortable, if you sort based on the governor's name then it's impossible to get the table back into date order
  • I just tried it, and was able to get the sortation back to date order. -VWF
    • How did you do that, given that the "term in office" column is unsortable.....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude I clicked the Governor column three times, and by the third time, the table was back as it was originally. I’m I confused? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

• That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude Replied, thank you so much for looking. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

SafariScribe

• I will do the source review.Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:12, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

  @SafariScribe Any luck? Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:27, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

• Source 1 does reference directly to Imo State, so how could it be used to verify such. Again, I advise you to remove it as the honorific titles must be cited.
  • ALL Nigerian State governors are referred to with that honorific title, with that in mind and with the source verifying that honorific prefix, I don’t see how it is a problem. Other lists have used this format and cited this source. -VWF
• Is the source 3 from The Punch necessary? I doubt the reliability in this context as the author used Wikipedia to do his/her research; it was written in the article, hence there is no need to cite that "Imo State is located in the South East geopolitical zone of Nigeria". You could simply start with "Imo State, a state in Nigeria, ....".
  • I saw that is very partly mentioned Wikipedia reporting something; it is evident that the piece was largely and original work and not FULLY Wikipedia-based. -VWF
• The ISSN of source 27 Is not showing any data, likewise that of source 31
  • The data is from directly from the ISSN portal, here too for the other
• I am afraid of this opinion piece (source 38) and source 53
• What makes The Whistler a reliable source?
• These are what I have for now.Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:30, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

List of House of Representatives constituencies of Belize

Nominator(s): -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Central America this time. I’ve removed some fluff, consolidated a few data sections into the main table, consolidated all prose into the lead and history section, and improved sourcing. If this gets promoted it would be the first FL under the ambit of WikiProject Belize. Recent similar FLs: Nepal, Bahamas. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:57, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Olliefant

• Explain how electors are designated
  • The country doesn't have an Electoral college. The representatives are directly elected by all eligible voters. I've changed the cell header to "Electorate" like in the FLs mentioned above and added a line about minimum age for voters to the lead. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
• Explain why and when there is redistricting
• There should be a dedicated notes section for the two EFNs
• Also both EFNs are unsourced
• Could use some analysis about partisan compesistion
  • I'm not entirely convinced that adding something about Belize's two party system is appropriate for this list. Elections in Belize seems like a more apt target, but I could be persuaded with a good argument for including it here too. -MPGuy2824 (talk)
    • I think a comparable article which is currently up for FLC is United States congressional delegations from Arkansas, this list briefly discusses partisan compesition, I don't think anything too long is needed just maybe a sentence or two briefly explaining who the major parties are for those unfamilire with Belize's politics. Olliefant (she/her)
• I think the infobox text "[National Assembly Building], Independence Hill, [Belmopan], Belize" is technically a WP:GEOLINK violation. I dont think "National Assembly Building" should be included in the place name. It should say "[National Assembly Building] at Independence Hill, [Belmopan], Belize" or something like that
• I feel the two see also links should be included in prose
• The dash at the end of the table should say the first overall election
  • I've added the earliest year in that column to the last cell, but this could get confusing: the cell could mean "first election since all these constituencies existed together" or "first election in which at least one these constituencies existed". What do you think? -MPGuy2824 (talk)
    • I think its fine how it is currently
• The 1981 constitution is linked twice in the lead

Thats what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 15:32, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

@Olliefant: Inline replied to some, and done the rest. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 14:08, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824: I have responded above Olliefant (she/her) 18:51, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

@Olliefant: Done all now. Please have another look. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:33, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Support good job on this Olliefant (she/her) 15:15, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "This was reinstated in 1935, but it was made up of only nominated members" => "This was reinstated in 1935 but was made up of only nominated members"
• "British Honduras gained full self-government and a new constitution was passed, in 1963" - there's no reason for that comma to be there
• "to ensure that their voting population be as equal as possible to each other, as required by the constitution" => "to ensure that their voting populations are as equal as possible, as required by the constitution"
• "but voting isn't compulsory" => "but voting is not compulsory"
• "Dangriga was known as Stann Creek Town till the 1980s" => "Dangriga was known as Stann Creek Town until the 1980s"
• "Stann Creek West was known as Stann Creek Rural till 1984" => "Stann Creek West was known as Stann Creek Rural until 1984" -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:27, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

  @ChrisTheDude: Fixed all. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:44, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:15, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• File:Belmopan Parliament.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Belize - Caribbean.svg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Belize constituencies, blank.svg - CC BY-SA 4.0 This would need sourcing to make sure it shows the actual constituencies, please add a source for the borders or names in the description on wikimedia.

  I recolored the map that was originally uploaded by someone else. That uploader hasn't been active for a year, but I put up a query on their commons' talk page. Hopefully, there is a response. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:29, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

  Notic3ed that the Bahamas page also doesn't cite anything of the sort. i'll pass image review but it is up to the coordinators whether this is valid or not.

• Alt text is good
• Will do source review
• What does total mean in the second table for the First Election section. I think you should change this to N/A or explain it in the lead as it is confusing. From a cursory glance at the source, this isn't mentioned there either

  @Easternsahara: See Olliefant's section above where she suggested this. It means "first election in which at least one these constituencies existed". Would it help a reader to quickly understand this if "Total" was replaced by "Overall"? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:53, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

  I'll add here, my thought process was at a glance its not immediately obvious when the first election was held without looking at all entries and finding the oldest date Olliefant (she/her) 20:57, 20 October 2025 (UTC)

  I could also change the column header to "Constituency start" or something along those lines. Then the last cell wouldn't need to be filled. Additionally, the table is sortable using that column. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:25, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

  I still think it's useless and can the information you talk you want it to display can just be found by looking at the table. However, the total for population requires calculations so it serves a purpose unlike the total for constituency first election.

  I think I've solved this by changing the row header to "Overall" and adding a footnote to the last cell. -MPGuy2824 (talk)

• Per WP:INFOBOXCITE u can remove infobox citations
• Think it would make more sense for scope row to be on the Constituencies rather than the number that they are
• Similarly, row scope the event rather than the year in history section (this can be changed with the nepal list too

Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 06:04, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

• @Easternsahara: I had already removed the citations from the infobox a few days back.

  Did the other two suggestions for this list. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:11, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

• Sorry for the late source review
• Sources 1, 2, 6-10 pass
• WP:GLOBALSECURITY remove citation 3
• citation 4 (azp news) seems fine but I will not pass it until you remove information from the gs citation
• pass 5, history and constituency citations
• constituteproject.org should be changed to just Constitute otherwise pass 6

@MPGuy2824: seems good, will pass source review preemptively as I trust you'll resolve the above issues.User:Easternsahara_{please review this and this} 21:54, 25 October 2025 (UTC)

I've fixed the Constitue Project ref and swapped out the globalsecurity.org one. Thanks for the review. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Ken Carson discography

Nominator(s): Chchcheckit (talk) 12:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

I am nominating this for featured list because... 1. to finish work on a Ken Carson studio albums good topic, and 2. I think I've got everything down? Not sure if I need to include his production work (honestly I don't know where information on that is rn) or would have to put that in a separate page.

Either way. Ty.// Chchcheckit (talk) 12:40, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Accessibility review (MOS:DTAB)

• Tables need captions, which allow screen reader software to jump straight to named tables without having to read out all of the text before it each time. Visual captions can be added by putting |+ caption_text as the first line of the table code; if that caption would duplicate a nearby section header, you can make it screen-reader-only by putting |+ {{sronly|caption_text}} instead.
  •  Done // Chchcheckit (talk) 11:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• The scope for the "Peak chart positions" in all the tables should be "colgroup" since it spans multiple header cells.
  •  Done // Chchcheckit (talk) 11:55, 10 October 2025 (UTC)
• Please see MOS:DTAB for example table code if this isn't clear.
• A lead image would be nice. (please  mention me on reply) -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:03, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 done all but lead image, which I don't have; would his signature work instead? // Chchcheckit (talk) 11:56, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

  Lead image: Never mind, don't add his signature.

  I see that you noticed (and corrected) the missing table captions.

  Support on table accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:13, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Staraction

• In 2019, he signed to Playboi Carti's record label Opium and the following year released two EPs, Boy Barbie and Teen X, the latter which spawned his first hit single "Yale". This feels a little bit runny to me. Consider instead: In 2019, he signed to Playboi Carti's record label, Opium. The following year, he released two EPs, Boy Barbie and Teen X. The latter spawned his first hit single, "Yale".
  •  Done // Chchcheckit (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• Following the release of the Teen X: Relapsed EP earlier that year, This doesn't make sense timeline-wise for me. The previous sentence refers to him releasing two EPs in 2020, neither of which are Teen X: Relapsed. Maybe add some more clarification here? I'm assuming you mean 2021, based on what's said later, but reading it is a little confusing.
  •  Fixed // Chchcheckit (talk) 19:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)
• I understand there are not many free images of Carson to work with. Perhaps add an image of one of the artists he worked with under "Guest appearances", such as Young Thug?

Thanks for your work! Providing a courtesy ping for @Chchcheckit. (please ping on reply) Staraction (talk | contribs) 18:41, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

A quick skim reveals some similar articles that include production work. See Nas discography for an example. I've noticed some articles split discography and production into two different articles as well; see Kanye West discography. I think the article title may need to change if you intend to split these into two pages. At the very least, I think you should track down an RS that describes some of his production work. Staraction (talk | contribs) 18:52, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

@Staraction Tried finding what I could; only three songs, so I've left a small "production credits" header and left it at that with the relevant things. // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

in other words  Done // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

@Staraction ping // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Apologies for the delay. This looks good. I trust you've looked for an image. Support Staraction (talk | contribs) 15:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Re-pinging @Chchcheckit since it doesn't look like the original ping actually went through. Best, Staraction (talk | contribs) 19:01, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Oh, sorry. I will address this tomorrow, as I am pretty tired rn. I did tweak the lead in refeence to bullet point 1 and 2. // Chchcheckit (talk) 19:09, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Also yes I did get the ping I didn't plan to respond until I attempted to solve the production discography query // Chchcheckit (talk) 19:10, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Source review

• Refs 13, 14, and 17 seem to have website formatted wrong
• Linking is inconsistent, for example "HotNewHipHop" is linked in ref 43 but not 41
• Dates are not consistent, some use slash dates some use MDY
• I think things like refs 3 and 4 should be EFNs and the sources they cite should be individual entries under references and not just grouped under the one
• Can the Youtube sources be replaced/dropped?
• Lots of the sources have MOS:DASH errors
• Why is "Our Generation Music" a reliable source?
• Why is "uDiscover Music" a reliable source?
• Why is "Resolve Media Group" a reliable source?
• Not mandated but I'd run IAbot

Thats what I found ping me when done. Olliefant (she/her) 10:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments from TheDoctorWho

• The article needs a short description
• Probably needs {{Use American English}} added
• Ditto for {{Use MDY dates}}
• For the sale and certifications columns in the tables in which no data is available, I suggest adding {{N/a}}
• Do we have exact dates for when Lost Files and Lost Files 4 were released?
• Of note, many of those EPs and Mixtapes (particularly Lost Files 2-4) are listed as having been released on streaming, yet I didn't see them on Spotify, SoundCloud, or Tidal. Is there any information regarding this. Were they released and then "unreleased" for a particular reason. Did they never exist on streaming?
• Similarly, I'd add {{N/a}} for the non-certified singles and other charted and certified songs

Think that's all I have! TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:44, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

Electoral history of Dan Quayle

Nominator(s): Olliefant (she/her) 13:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

My second Vice President Electoral History list, Dan Quayle has participated in 3ish primary elections and 6 general elections. A much less extensive set than my previous FLC but still a long career none the less. I would like to thank Bremps for comments on the Peer review and JoeM3120 for creating the page back in 2013. I hope to continue this series of VPEH soon. Olliefant (she/her) 13:38, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

"But just the old favorites, eh?" - The Fourth Doctor Who

Comments from Bgsu98 (10/7/25)

• "He and Bush ran for reelection were defeated in the 1992 presidential election by Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton and Tennessee Senator Al Gore." There appears to be a missing transition somewhere in there. Done
• What was Quayle up to before running for the U.S. House of Representatives? Did he not serve at the state level, or do these articles only focus on national elections? I cannot remember from your last article (on Joe Biden, right?). Even if the U.S. House race was his first election, maybe a brief explanation of where he came from prior to that first election could provide some background.
  • It was Joe Biden, the history covers all levels of government, per Electoral history of Joe Biden#County council election (1970)
• Okay, I see now that he was the general manager of a newspaper. Perhaps some mention of this could be put at the beginning of this section, but leave the details about how his work in newspapers helped him in the general election where you have it. Done
• "In 1978, Quayle ran for reelection he won the Republican nomination unopposed..." Another missing transition. Done
• "Quayle's aids..." I believe they're aides.
• "Quayle received almost twice as many votes as Walda and winning a second term." That should either be "and won" or ", winning". Done
• "Additionally, Bush was hoping "balance the ticket" geographically..." Another missing transition. Done
• "Additionally, Bush was hoping "balance the ticket" geographically and selecting Quayle, a midwesterner, would help him do so." Perhaps clarify that Bush believed that selecting Quayle would help him... Otherwise it comes off as speculation. Done
• "Bentsen, a friend of Kennedy's," I don't believe you need the 's. Done
• Change "the Washington Post" to The Washington Post. Done

User:OlifanofmrTennant: Please let me know if you have any questions! Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:14, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: Done Olliefant (she/her) 13:12, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

• Support based on my review of the prose. I will look at the tables and images, but do not expect any issues. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:21, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
• All images have appropriate licenses, alt-text, and captions. Image review passed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Brief comments

• "Quayle decided to run, because he felt that Bayh's liberal views did not reflect the political positions of Indianans and that they led to poor economic results." - this and any similar statements should be in the form "Quayle said he decided to run because", as we don't know if that's true or just a campaign position.
• The 1988 presidential election table has Dukakis with 0 electoral votes, but he got 111.

--PresN 13:48, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

I adjusted the wording across the page however for the second point. The data in the table has 111 for the EV count but its displaying 0. I think this is due to the inclusion of an EFN next to the number. I don't know how to fix it without removing the EFN Olliefant (she/her) 22:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

@PresN: forgot to ping Olliefant (she/her) 22:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

User:OlifanofmrTennant: I moved that note to under the table, so it now shows Dukakis' electoral votes. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:38, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks! Olliefant (she/her) 22:39, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

If you want to expand the note, perhaps wikilink faithless elector, that might be a good idea. Bgsu98 (Talk) 22:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• "Quayle began his political career in 1976 by unseating incumbent Democratic Representative J. Edward Roush" - previous paragraph says 1977
  • The previous paragraph says he took office in 1977, the election was held in 1976.
    • Fair enough, I forgot that the US system is somewhat different to what I am used to here in the UK where the winner of an election basically takes up their post literally as soon as the result is announced -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:15, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
• "Quayle upset three term incumbent" => "Quayle upset three-term incumbent" Done
• "chosen by then-Vice President George H. W. Bush, to serve as his" - no need for a comma there Done
• "He and Bush ran for reelection were but defeated" - huh? I think you mean "He and Bush ran for reelection but were defeated" Done
• Also, does "re-election" not have a hyphen in US English?
  • Usually no [2][3][4]
• "In 1976, Quayle, then a general manager of the Huntington Herald-Press" - newspaper names are usually written in italics Done
• "The South Bend Tribune criticized" - same here Done
• "Quayle told the The South Bend Tribune" - and here :-) Done
• "would be able to effectively attack Democratic presidential nominee, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis" => "would be able to effectively attack the Democratic presidential nominee, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis"
• "replacing Quayle as his running-mate in his expected 1992 reelection." => "replacing Quayle as his running-mate in his expected 1992 reelection campaign" Done
• "was seen as a surprise to many pundits" = > "was seen as a surprise by many pundits" Done
• The "Notes" section is empty so I see no reason for it to be there Done

-- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:28, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

@ChrisTheDude: Done Olliefant (she/her) 14:36, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

• Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:15, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Source review (11/30/25)

This table checks 10 passages from throughout the article (20.0% of 50 total passages). These passages contain 12 inline citations (17.6% of 68 in the article). Generated with the Veracity user script. Bgsu98 (Talk) 15:55, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Reference #	Letter	Source	Archive	Status	Notes
Democrat J. Edward Roush. Quayle stated that part of his decision to run was because he felt there was a need for congressional reform, labeling Roush's long career as part of the problem.
1	b	newspapers.com
Despite this, Quayle defeated Roush by a margin of 19,401 votes, around ten percent of the vote.
7	a	clerk.house.gov
In 1978, Darrel Christian, writing for the Associated Press, believed that Quayle would use a 1978 House victory to "springboard" a future run for one of Indiana's Senate seats.
9	b	newspapers.com			Note: Associated Press doesn't need to be italicized in this sentence.
In the primary election, he faced Roger Marsh. Marsh was a harsh critic of Quayle, leading to backlash from within the Indiana Republican Party. Due to this, Quayle was considered the favorite to receive the nomination.
15	b	newspapers.com
On election day, Quayle was re-elected in a landslide.
22		newspapers.com
During a 2016 interview with Indianapolis Monthly, Quayle explained that he believed he was selected due to his age and his role in writing the Job Training Partnership Act of 1982.
29		indianapolismonthly.com
The choice of running mate was considered to be particularly important given Bush's age and widely reported health issues.
36		buffalonews.com	web.archive.org		The article is behind a paywall; change the access notation to subscription required in the citation.
Ultimately, on August 19, 1992, Quayle and Bush were renominated at the 1992 Republican National Convention. Bush received 2,166 delegates, and Quayle was nominated through a voice vote.
41	a	"Quayle Bashes Clinton on Issues". The New York Times. Associated Press. January 12, 1999. Archived…	web.archive.org		This source confirms none of this.
42	a	politico.com
In the years leading up to the 2000 presidential election, news sources began to speculate that Quayle would again attempt a run for the presidency.
41	b	"Quayle Bashes Clinton on Issues". The New York Times. Associated Press. January 12, 1999. Archived…	web.archive.org
47		washingtonpost.com	web.archive.org
However, some of his aides told The Washington Post that both Quayle and his wife Marilyn felt that even if he won in New Hampshire and Iowa, he could not clinch the nomination due to being outfunded by other candidates and dropped out.
51	b	washingtonpost.com			As far as I can tell, the source does not confirm the last part of the statement ("due to being outfunded..."). Additionally, that last tag ("and dropped out") does not fit in this context. Recommend a slight rewrite.

User:Olliefant There are a few issues as shown above. Let me know when they have been addressed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 18:04, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

@Bgsu98: I believe I have fixed the above issues Olliefant (she/her) 01:50, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Source review passed. Bgsu98 (Talk) 01:57, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

List of Intangible Cultural Heritage elements in Ukraine

Nominator(s): Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:25, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

I've been updating this list for a couple of years, so I figured it should be my first individual FL nomination. As far as I know, this is the first Intangible Cultural Heritage list to be nominated as well. I have been adding descriptions to each element and greatly improving the list for several months, and now I believe it is complete and meets the FL criteria. The review process will probably take a while as this is a rather long list, but any suggestions and improvements are welcome. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:25, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

Very brief comments but could you add to what the national register and Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity do. I am thinking of descriptions similar to those in the WHS lists. 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 12:36, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean exactly. Similarly to the WHS lists, the lead defines Intangible Cultural Heritage, and then the following paragraph mentions that the National Register safeguards these elements on the national level. Do you want me to expand these descriptions or were you thinking of something else? Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 16:33, 1 October 2025 (UTC)

Do items have to be inscribed on the national register to be recognized by UNESCO, and what specific criteria (LIke "UNESCO lists sites under ten criteria; each entry must meet at least one of the criteria. Criteria i through vi are cultural, and vii through x are natural" from Ukranian whs list) are there to being inscribed on each of the lists? 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 03:16, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

"The Ministry of Culture of Ukraine has also formed the National Register ... which is required by the Convention for the further nomination of these elements to the UNESCO lists" – so inscription on the National Register precedes the nomination to the UNESCO lists. ICH elements don't have to meet one or more criteria from a certain list to be inscribed, unlike World Heritage Sites. Instead they have much more rigid sets of criteria, which in my opinion are self-explanatory (e.g., for the Urgent Safeguarding List, an element must fit the definition of ICH, must be endangered, the country must attempt to safeguard it, it should be practiced within the nominating country, etc). I can add these in a footnote if you think it's necessary to include this info, though I think it's somewhat redundant. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 06:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Yeah you could add them to footnotes, and on the same subject the footnotes in this article are quite large. You should think about integrating them into the main text of the article per H:FN Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 04:54, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

I'm still not convinced on the necessity of adding this. These criteria are similar to the ones necessary for World Heritage Sites that are not elaborated upon in WHS lists (such as proper management and safeguarding, and a high enough level of authenticity and integrity). Now that I look at the ICH criteria again, I believe they're already mentioned in the lead (the definition of ICH, the facts that these elements are protected and nominated by individual countries that maintain their own national registers) and subsections under each list (that the Representative List aims to represent the country worldwide, the Urgent Safeguarding list is for endangered elements, and the Register of Good Safeguarding Practices accredits programs and projects that safeguard ICH). I believe there are no major omissions from UNESCO's ICH criteria in the text.

As for the footnotes - do you have any specific ones in mind? I believe they generally contain information that is too technical to include in the text or would otherwise disrupt the flow, but maybe you have some ideas on how to incorporate some of the info. For example, the first footnote on the name changes of the Ministry of Culture is important to understand the different names that may be mentioned in the sources, but at the same time this information is not important enough to be in the lead itself. Similarly, the regional/local ICH registers are important to mention but, as they are not included in the list, probably don't belong to the main text. And I'm not quite sure how big of a footnote is too big (especially thinking back to the List of Ukrainian placenames affected by derussification). Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:56, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

In case it helps, I agree with leaving the footnotes as they are. They all include important clarifying details and aren't excessively long and have a better than good proportion to the overall size of this list. Dan the Animator 17:20, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Also I have a general question not directed to anyone in particular about the usage of Transliteration and Lang templates. I know that it's recommended to use them whenever possible, but this list has lots of cases where these templates could be utilized, in fact so many that I'm worried that adding them would make the page significantly larger and possibly cause loading problems. Currently, I'm simply using italics instead of these templates (as mentioned in the footnote for the description columns), but I'm not sure whether that's registered by screen readers. Then should I keep the italics or replace them with the templates? Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 08:32, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

@Shwabb1 I think adding in all the transliteration and lang templates wouldn't be that much though if it starts to slow down or causes issues, there is a special Wiki markup bypass that helps for cases like this. It is explained briefly here. In the case of this list, Module:Lang would probably be the correct invoke. The very long article Japanese conjugation has the same issue and already uses #invoke: in place of a bunch of templates but also keeps a lot of templates as well (a lot more than this list does currently I think).

So, I would consider simply adding in all the translit and lang templates as they normally would but if there is a strong concern with the byte size, just add in only the regular translit templates and make all the lang templates use the markup {{#invoke:lang|lang|uk|2=Традиція Косівської мальованої кераміки|italics=yes}} (the Cyrillic text is a placeholder example). Also, per MOS:LANG and as you mentioned, the italics don't get picked up by screen readers so the templates or invoke markup would be better. This is my first experience with this class of markup so hopefully it works (the sample markup above worked fine for me in a test) but feel free to let me know if there's any issues with it or for invoke markup for other templates. Dan the Animator 04:39, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

I just added the Translit/Lang templates, and you're right, they didn't add as much size to the page as I expected. Thanks for clarifying when to use them and the alternative way of invoking them as well. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 08:01, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Small update - two elements were added yesterday, so I updated the list today. I followed the same format, though unfortunately couldn't find any images. The Ministry of Culture will probably post an article about these in the coming days and I may upload images from there if the license checks out. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:39, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

MPGuy2824

• 4 images are missing alt-text (104 images, 100 alt-texts).
• Change "Revived due to the Disappearance of Tradition" to "Revived after the disappearance of the tradition".
• All section titles need to follow MOS:SECTIONCAPS. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:56, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

  First and second done, but don't the names of the lists count as proper nouns, thus meaning that title case applies? UNESCO uses title case for its lists, and similarly the style is kept in all the lists of World Heritage Sites, many of which are FLs. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 08:17, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

  @MPGuy2824 (forgot to mention in reply). Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 06:58, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

  • You've used the "caption" param for various tables. I don't think that is considered by the wiki engine. At least I couldn't find anything about it in Help:Tables. Please remove them.

  • Done

  • A lead image would be nice. Either a locator map of Ukraine within Europe or one of the images from the first few tables.

  • I don't want the images to repeat, so added a locator map. Let me know if one showing disputed or occupied territories would fit better.

  • Support on accessibility. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:48, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

    @MPGuy2824 I addressed your comments. Thanks for the support. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 08:09, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Dantheanimator

Great seeing this nominated and congrats Shwabb on your first FLN! :) Adding in a few small things I noticed but will try to do a fuller review when I have time and maybe help with the source review too

• "Three items – Embroidery technique 'white-in-white' of the town Reshetylivka in Poltava region, Rivne region tradition of the Polissia Dudka-Vykrutka, and Safeguarding practice of the "Tradition of the Generous Evening in Ukraine" through formal and non-formal education – were nominated for inclusion on the UNESCO lists in 2026."--> "Three items were nominated for inclusion on the UNESCO Lists in 2026: the 'white-on-white' embroidery technique from Reshetylivka in the Poltava region; the Dudka-Vykrutka tradition of Polissia in the Rivne region; and the safeguarding practice of the 'Tradition of the Generous Evening in Ukraine' through formal and non-formal education." (recommendation from ChatGPT, which I also think flows better)

• Done (though I did not re-word the names of the nominated items since they're on the UNESCO website and will probably stay the same if these items go through to the UNESCO Lists next year)

• Looks good to me

• "In addition, one hundred fifteen items are inscribed on the National Register of Elements of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Ukraine." --> Maybe this can be simplified to "In addition, one hundred fifteen items are inscribed on Ukraine's National Register."

• Done

• "Although all regions of Ukraine are represented in the Register through" --> Does this Register refer to the National Register of UNESCO's register (assuming it's the national one but might be good to add National/UNESCO for clarity)

• UNESCO manages three Lists, while the state controls the Register that consists of five Inventories. I can see how this can be confusing since all these terms are similar, so this is fixed.

• Makes sense and looks good now

• Maybe retitle the "Media" columns to "Photo" for consistency with other lists? (all the rows looked like they had either Photos or were empty so it would also be more precise)

• There is one video (Cossack's songs on the UNESCO list), and I initially expected to find more videos (especially for other song and dance-related items) so I titled the columns "Media". I did find a video of the singing tradition of Luka but the YouTube video uploading tool did not let me upload it to Wikimedia Commons (perhaps because of this screenshot from the video that is already linked to it, which is what I used in the end). If you believe that the Cossack's songs video is out of place, I can replace it with an image and retitle the columns to "Photo" for consistency.

• Ah sorry missed that one though I think it's a great inclusion and definitely should be kept. Considering your explanation, I think the "Media" titling is fine so no worries with that. Also about the uploading issue, I haven't had much Commons experience yet but this page lists some alternative ways to upload videos/media to Commons that could be helpful? Not sure if this is the same as the issue you described but in my experience, sometimes not having a separate wikidata item can cause issues since only one file can be connected to one wikidata entry, and it might be necessary to create a separate wikidata entry. Also maybe would double check the copyright of the video just in case before retrying an upload to make sure it has a CC/open domain license. Hopefully this helps a bit with it.

• Yes, I used the video2commons tool listed to upload directly from YouTube, which did not work. I'll try to download the video through some other website and upload it from my computer instead, maybe that will work.
  Upd.: it worked this time and I replaced the screenshot with the video itself. Now there should be two videos in total.

• Forgot to reply here: yup two videos now and both look and sound great. Nice work :) Dan the Animator 21:49, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

Dan the Animator 01:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

• "These three groups are specifically recognized as the indigenous peoples of Crimea, a disputed region as the result of its internationally unrecognized annexation by Russia in 2014. Most countries recognize the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol as parts of Ukraine despite the de facto Russian control over the area." --> "These three groups are recognized by the Ukrainian Government as the indigenous peoples of Crimea. Since Russia's occupation and internationally unrecognized annexation of the peninsula in 2014, the territory of Crimea has been disputed, with most countries recognizing it as de jure part of Ukraine while de facto it remains under Russian control." Other rewordings also work but I thought this flowed best and was the most informative, accurate, and direct.

• Mostly done, though I changed the wording a bit as it's imporant to mention that, administratively, the Crimean peninsula consists of two entities (ARC and Sevastopol). Let me know if you think of a better way to incorporate this information into the text.

• The wording looks perfect, nice work! :)

• The UNESCO tables have a column for No./Nomination Number but I couldn't find anywhere where the numbering system is explained (i.e. why does the first item start with the number 00893? what do the numbers exactly mean (when the nomination was submitted/accepted/etc.)? maybe how are the numbers read/constructed (does each digit/group of digits represent something or are the numbers randomly generated)? who/what created/formalized the number standards and who manages them now/UNESCO)? Maybe adding in a efn note could help for this? For the National Register numbering, it likely doesn't need any explanation though would be curious if it has always been three digits or adds a digit when it reaches that amount.

• I don't know either how the UNESCO's numbering system works, but I do know that the numbers are assigned to specific nominations when they are submitted to UNESCO before they are reviewed. For example, in this list of nominations that will be evaluated this December, every nomination gets its own number. Regardless, I think this information isn't very important (the system used for World Heritage Sites isn't explained in the respective lists, and that one is even more complicated as it sometimes involves letters). As for the National Register - a digit is added once a new element is inscribed (e.g., currently there are 115 elements, so the newest one is numbered 115).

• I see. Considering past WHS FLs don't explain it, I think it should be fine without it. Also for the National Register, makes sense and thanks for telling me

• For refs with "National Historical Library of Ukraine" (#33, 56, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 139), can it be linked to Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine?

• As far as I know, these are different entities

• Should be fine as-is than

• For all the same refs, "|journal=Нематеріальна культурна спадщина в документних джерелах" should become "|script-journal=Нематеріальна культурна спадщина в документних джерелах |trans-journal=[insert trans name here]"

• Done

• For ref #40 (Geographical indications of Ukraine), maybe add in "|publisher=" since based on the current info in it, it's unclear if this an official source or third-party (also when I try to access it, I get a warning message about an unsafe connection)

• The website is run by an NGO focusing on the development of GIs in Ukraine. I'm not sure what to add for the publisher in this case.

• The English-translation of the NGO name should be put in for publisher than since it's the publisher/manager of the website

• For ref #72, 105, is "|website=Ukrainer" the same as Ukraїner?

• Indeed it is (I could have sworn I checked whether there's a page on English Wikipedia on it when making those references)

• For ref #76, I'm not too sure about this suggestion but would it be more accurate to have "|website=Helmiaziv hromada" typed out as/linked to Helmiaziv rural hromada?

• Yes, that would technically be more correct, but the website is simply named "Helmiaziv hromada"

• Completely optional, you could add in as a piped red link to Helmiaziv rural hromada (i.e. "|website=Helmiaziv hromada") that way when the hromada's article is created it'll automatically link to it though also completely fine left without any links too

• For ref #92, "|website=Chernivtsi Oblast Council" should be linked to Chernivtsi Oblast Council

• Done

• For ref #96, 150, "|website=Rayon.in.ua" probably could be decapped to "|website=rayon.in.ua" (this is how I've seen it usually though not sure which way would be more correct)

• Done

• For ref #107, "|website=Hadiach.City" maybe could be linked to Hadiach? (technically not the most accurate link but it sounds like a local media website just for the city)
• For ref #133, "|website=Kitsman.City" same question as above
• For ref #149, "|website=SarnyNews.City" same question as above

• All the "City" newspapers belong to the same platform of independent media created with the help of this company. Yes, they are intended to publish local news, but they aren't owned by the local governments, so I think it makes more sense not to link the city names.

• Interesting. Better kept without any links than.

• For "which was drafted in 2003 and took effect in 2006." in the lead, I think it would look slightly better having ref #2 together with ref #3 at the end of the sentence since there's only a few words that separate the two and the sentence only has two refs but this is optional (WP:CITEFOOT allows for it but up to you and both are fine with me)

• Done

• "Inscription of new heritage elements on the UNESCO Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists for their protection and safeguarding is determined by the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, an organization established by the Convention." --> "The inscription of new heritage elements on UNESCO's Intangible Cultural Heritage Lists for protection and safeguarding is determined by the Intergovernmental Committee for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, an organization established by the Convention."

• Done

• "The Ministry of Culture of Ukraine has also formed the National Register of Elements of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Ukraine to safeguard the country's cultural elements since 2012, which is required by the Convention for the further nomination of these elements to the UNESCO lists." --> "Since 2012, the Ministry of Culture of Ukraine has also maintained the National Register of Elements of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Ukraine to safeguard the country's cultural elements, which is required by the Convention for the further nomination of elements to the UNESCO lists." (flows a bit better with the preceding paragraph)

• Done

• "must play a significant role in the social life of the community" --> "must play a significant role in the social life of a community" (refers to many different communities, not just one)

• Done

• "The submissions are reviewed by the Expert Council on Intangible Cultural Heritage that controls the inscription of elements on the Register." --> "Submissions of elements are reviewed by the Expert Council on Intangible Cultural Heritage, an advisory body that controls the inscription of elements on the Register." (used this Rada ref for getting its definition as an advisory board, though not sure if the additional ref is needed since the original ref/wording already implies that it is an advisory body; also added in the link since based on the Rada law, it seems to be statutory body as defined by that article though this might be a bit too WP:EASTEREGG)

• Done

• "The first Ukrainian element listed – Petrykivka decorative painting – was inscribed in 2013." --> "The first Ukrainian element listed—Petrykivka decorative painting—was inscribed in 2013."

• I think em dashes can sometimes look awkward (especially if there's a reference inside), and while this is not the case here, I'd rather use a unified style. WP:DASHVAR allows the use of spaced en dashes in these cases.

• Sure, that works well too

• "Pysanka is a transnational element shared with Estonia." --> maybe expand slightly to describe what Pysanka is, e.g. "The egg painting tradition Pysanka is a transnational element shared with Estonia."

• Done

• "In addition, one hundred fifteen items are inscribed on Ukraine's National Register." --> "In addition, 115 items are inscribed on Ukraine's National Register." (WP guidelines are somewhat vague to any standards but it seems that typing it out numerically as 115, rather than three words, is preferable.

• Done

• "The inventory includes elements of intangible cultural heritage that are under threat of disappearing due to hostilities, consequences of temporary occupation, natural impacts, or temporary displacement of population." --> "The inventory includes elements of intangible cultural heritage that are under threat of disappearing due to hostilities, consequences of Russian occupation, natural impacts, or temporary displacement of population." (more accurate and less redundant)

• Done

• I also noticed that all the inventory subsections under the National Register have a brief sentence explaining their scope/purpose except for the first, Inventory of Intangible Cultural Heritage. Maybe might be good to add in a brief sentence there too? Probably also fine as-is

• The source actually does not provide an explanation of this inventory, even though it's the largest. It's not exactly the same as UNESCO's Representative List as it doesn't aim to represent the culture globally. Rather, it seems to be the "main" part of the National Register, covering ICH elements that otherwise don't fit the criteria for the other inventories. Now that I look at it, the Ministry's article that I've been using doesn't explain the inventory of revived elements either, so I replaced that with a better source.

• I see and good work with the improved ref for the revived elements sentence. If there's no source to describe that list, probably best to leave as-is then

Thank you for the review. I replied to all the comments above, have a look whenever you have time and feel free to leave any comments on the list itself. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 08:49, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @Shwabb1! Changes look great and see my comment above for the video uploading issue. Will add a few new suggestions shortly. Dan the Animator 18:13, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

@Dantheanimator I've replied to the new comments. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 19:58, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

@Shwabb1 thanks for the quick work and replies :) I added in some ref suggestions/edits I found from looking over all of them and after you reply for those I think I'll give another look to see if there's anything else that should be fixed during the review. Dan the Animator 21:47, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

@Shwabb1 just finished all the remaining suggestions I could think of for the lead. Dan the Animator 00:24, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

@Dantheanimator I finished working on your suggestions. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 10:57, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

@Shwabb1 great work! I think this is ready and happy to support for promotion. Congrats on a successful list and many thanks again for all the work on it. :) Dan the Animator 17:14, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments

Bookmark for tomorrow. I'll probably check the images, likely sourcing and maybe text too. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 06:08, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara just a reminder to review in case you forgot (I see you're busy with multiple things so no rush). Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 12:54, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara sorry for the ping but it's been over a week since you started the check, please consider continuing if possible. I understand that you have other things to work on but I don't want the nomination to be closed for inactivity. Thanks. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 11:23, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

• File:Europe-Ukraine.svg - CC BY 3.0
  • Per MOS:ALTMAP You should describe the information being shown, which is Ukraine is located in Eastern Europe or smth similar
• File:Blue flowers box.jpg - multiple licenses, all good
• File:Kraina Mriy DSCN2171.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
• File:Adaviye Efendiyeva 01.JPG - pd
• File:Ukrainian folk pysanky.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Ukrainian borshch 04.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Кобзарі Кость Черемський та Назар Божинський.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:0513 Die Sammlung pokutischer Keramik-Geschirr aus dem 19. Jahrhundert im Stadtmuseum in Sanok.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Ткацький верстат Музей ткацтва.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Опішня. Продавчиня кераміки.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Таріль дерев'яна "Серпень".jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:ОЙ, НА ГОРІ ТА Й ЖЕНЦІ ЖНУТЬ.jpg - pd
• File:Reshetylivka.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:2022-01-13 Artem Galkin Malanka Ukrainer 03.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Авторський гобелен Ольги Пілюгіної "Квітуча родина".jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Bubnivka Ceramics 2 Ukraine.JPG - cc0
• File:Бортництво - стародавній промисел Полісся.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:A basket full of Hutsul pysanky.JPG - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Folk ritual Vodinnia Kusta in Ukraine 2022.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Самчиківський розпис.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:2025-06-29 113455 karpenkakaroho11.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Верховинські колядники.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Аркан.jpeg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Музична фолькльорна іграшка.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Воскові вінки на Вінничині.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Borsch 05.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Carpathian Lizhnyks.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Emroidered shirts from Borshchiv museum Ukraine.jpg - CC BY 3.0
• File:Клембівська сорочка з квіткою.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Гуляння "Водити Володара".jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Yavorivsky-pyrig.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Сферична різдвяна звізда Мацьковичі.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Сахновщинський коровай.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Malanca din Crasna - Красноїльська Маланка 11.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Did, or Moshul,archaich personage on Christmas festival in Orlovka Kartal village waiting for the competiotion (Ukraine 2019).jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Вкусна домашна баница.JPG - This may be a copyright violation, it says that it got it from another website, please check this out (claims CC BY-SA 3.0)

• The website is dead. I checked the archived version and couldn't find any information about the file being released under a CC license, so I replaced it with another image.

• File:Adamivka 07.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Бузинник.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Автентичну страву «крупки» презентували у Житомирі 1.png - CC BY 4.0
• File:Yavoriv toy.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Лозоплетіння в с. Іза.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Sheep cheese production ukraine 02.png - CC BY 3.0
• File:Плацинда з лаваша.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Pysanky2011.JPG - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Борть на дубі.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Соломоплетіння у Турійській громаді.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Botar lekvar museum.jpg - CC BY-SA 3.0
• File:Обряд засівання з конем у селі Вістря.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Традиційний обрядовий хліб Вінниччини.jpg - CC BY 4.0 this is the source, does the Ukrainian government release their images into creative commons? I couldn't find a notice and if yes, then please tag it with the appropriate tag.

• Most Ukrainian government websites usually do (though not all). This one in particular notes at the bottom of the page that All content is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, unless otherwise noted.

• File:Гузь П.І. Кобзар.jpg - pd
• File:Map of Ukrainian dialects en.png - CC BY 3.0
• File:Buk008.jpg - PD
• File:Рогозоплетіння сіл Щітки та Писарівка.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• Source 1 pass, will continue review later.
• I will not be doing a source review as there are too many sources which are not in English. I think you should elaborate on the connection between the National Register of Ukraine and the UNSECO ICH because it seems like the national register could be placed on a separate list right now. Talk about how the national register helps get items promoted, what its goals are, etc. You should try to find a Ukranian speaking Wikipedian or do reviews for people and ask them for source reviews or something. You could also try the english wikipedia discord

• @Easternsahara: As noted in the lead, the main connection between the National Register and UNESCO lists is that the existence of the former is "required by the Convention for the further nomination of elements to the UNESCO lists". It doesn't just help get items promoted, but is a necessary step in the entire process (see Article 12 of the Convention). If the UNESCO ICH lists are compared to World Heritage Sites, then the National ICH Register is comparable to a combination of a national register of protected sites and the Tentative List. In addition to the further nomination to UNESCO lists, the National Register's goal is "to safeguard the country's cultural elements". So all of this is already covered in the lead. Is there something else that you were thinking of?
  And as for why this is one list rather than two - again, the National Register serves as an equivalent to the WHS Tentative List, but also there are very little items from Ukraine on the UNESCO ICH lists (less than eight, so not enough to meet WP:WIAFL if I were to nominate that for FL). The idea of ICH originates from UNESCO and the two lists are inherently connected, so I believe it makes sense to link them together.

• File:Традиція вбирання могильних хрестів.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Holubtsi.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Випасаня овець в Тарутінському степу.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
• File:Буковинське поминальне деревце з дарами.jpg - CC BY 4.0
• File:Hutsul artefacts.jpg - PD
• File:Gerdan 2.jpg - PD
• File:Жіноча сорочка з Гадяччини.jpg - CC BY 4.0

Pass image review per my spotcheck User:Easternsahara_{review and this} 20:53, 2 November 2025 (UTC)

Source review

Since it looks like no one else will be doing the source review soon, I'll try and at least give a partial spot check, if not a full source review. I'll probably do it over the next few days/this upcoming week given the 191 sources but might be quicker than that. This is my first source review too so any suggestions and help are definitely welcome. Dan the Animator 05:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

If you don't have time @Dantheanimator I can do this over the next couple of weeks. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks @Lajmmoore!! :) That would be perfect though I can help a bit too if needed. Dan the Animator 22:02, 22 November 2025 (UTC)

@Lajmmoore gentle reminder since over two weeks have passed. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 07:21, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Sorry @Dantheanimator and @Shwabb1 I've been all over the place and haven't got round to this. Lajmmoore (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Nominations for removal

Ancillary TV season block nominations

The following nominations do not require comments, but are included for bookkeeping purposes. The discussion of each TV season list takes place at the respective "season 1" nomination below.

Private Practice season 1

Notified: Aoba47, WikiProject Television

Recently these featured lists on seasons have been delisted, see the recent FLRC log. This was because of a consensus at the FLC talk page. This was also brought to MOS:TV's talk page (I am not able to find a link to that). Both these discussions stated that season lists should not be lists if they are properly developed. If they are not properly developed, then they can not be featured. I am nominating this to speed up the process, and I recommend to voters in this FLRC that you also nominate some lists of seasons. User:Easternsahara_{review this} 01:32, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

• Delist per project consensus. Aoba47 (talk) 02:35, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Blue Heelers season 13

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television

Most of the season lists have been delisted per the consensus. I am nominating this to speed up the process, and I encourage those who are participating in the nomination to also nominate one by going to WP:FL and picking a season list of their choice. User:Easternsahara_{review this} 01:16, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Moons of Saturn

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Solar System task force

Per the determination at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Moons of Neptune/archive1 that these articles about moons do not qualify as lists. It is a decent article, but should go through GA or FA instead. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:55, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

I think a larger discussion with more visibility to Wikiproject Astronomy, perhaps a request for consensus may be warranted. However, I have consulted people on the discord, and they don't seem to regard these types of articles as lists, which is understandable. In terms of content, there is only so much that a page can include without becoming an article. So, I would delist as the list isn't the main focus of this page. Also, I don't think it would be warranted to split the actual list of moons out, per WP:NOPAGE. User:Easternsahara_{review this} 01:21, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Moons of Uranus

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy/Solar System task force

Per the determination at Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Moons of Neptune/archive1 that these articles about moons do not qualify as lists. It is a decent article, but should go through GA or FA instead. Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:57, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Delist per my my comment User:Easternsahara_{review this} 01:23, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

List of World Heritage Sites in Spain

Notified: User talk:Tone, User talk:Easternsahara, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World Heritage Sites

The article is currently in a very disorganized state, with serious mismatches between the table headers and their corresponding content. In the first half of the list, the "Year listed" and "UNESCO data" columns appear to have been swapped, while in the latter part, the "Year listed" column instead displays locations. This seems to be an error caused by an incomplete update to the table format.

In the Tentative list section, only the names of the sites are provided. While that might have been acceptable when the list was promoted in 2010, current standards—following the examples of newer FLs such as List of World Heritage Sites in Italy—require this section to be presented in a proper table with additional details and descriptions.

Therefore, I believe the article no longer meets the criteria for a FL due to its insufficient content and structural issues, and its delisting should be considered. Nebulatria (talk) 20:59, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

I agree, I'll see if I can get some time to work on this list the following weekend. User:Easternsahara_{review and this} 23:18, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

I started working on this list a while ago to bring it up with the recent FL standards, since it was promoted before I started working on these lists systematically (as well as Madagascar, Cuba, Peru, and maybe some other). It definitely need work, which will be done eventually, it is just a question whether it is better to delist and renominate when fixed or wait until it is fixed. I may assist but cannot commit to fix it fully. --Tone 13:38, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

List of Iowa tornadoes

Notified: EF5, Easternsahara, ActuallyElite, WikiProject Weather

I've nominated this list because I don't believe it was properly scrutinized during the review process and simply is not up to FL levels as of right now. See Talk:List of Iowa tornadoes for more specifics, but what's on the table as I type this are a large table cited to a user-generated source (or one that can't be proved not to be UGC, anyway), a significant lack of comprehension listing of data that does exist in reliable sources and can be put together in an afternoon, arbitrary inclusion candidates, and general weird formatting throughout, especially in image placement and citations in the lede, the sort I wouldn't expect from featured content. Departure– (talk) 23:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

To clarify a few points:

• By "arbitrary", I mean the line in the sand being "intense tornadoes" being the only ones included and all others being completely discarded. No reason for this is given in the article itself.
  • Typically, lists that include large amounts of tornadoes draw the line at "intense tornadoes" (F3/equivalent), such as Tornadoes in Oklahoma, but again, no reason given. The only actual line I could think of a justification for would be "significant tornadoes" (F2/equivalent), as those are what expert of tornado record-keeping Thomas P. Grazulis uses in his Significant tornadoes line of books.
  • In addition, this list is missing numerous tornadoes within the "intense" range.
• Details about my UGC concern are further detailed at Talk:List of Iowa tornadoes#Tornado Paths source, but the short version is that a source cited in a table is listed as published by ArcGIS with no credits. ArcGIS is a software at the end of the day, and while it likely was produced by a reliable source (NWS or NOAA), there's no evidence beyond anecdotal comments about the scale of the source.
  • In addition, the source is almost certainly a tertiary source to be avoided in favor of a more focused source.
• There is some weird formatting right outside the lede. The lede itself also doesn't follow MOS:LEDE, with information in the opening not present in the body (though, with a citation).
• Sourcing in general has been brought up on the talk page as being far from featured-level. One was revealed to likely be a blog.
• More details than I can provide quickly here can be found on the article's talk page at the anchor Talk:List of Iowa tornadoes#What in the heck?. Departure– (talk) 23:45, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

One more note: List of Iowa tornadoes is currently scheduled to appear as Today's featured list starting October 6. Departure– (talk) 23:48, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

Delist per my talk page comments. As much as I hate to delist an article as recent as this, it simply isn’t up to par. ^EF⁵ 01:56, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

Update - I have been adding tornadoes over the past week from the Thomas P. Grazulis source, I am still working on completing the list. I changed the intense tornadoes meaning and put it as F3+ rated tornadoes. I removed both non reliable sources that were mentioned and replaced them with reliable ones. I do still have some work to do with adding tornadoes in the tables, but it is in the right direction. ActuallyElite (talk) 17:38, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Wait ActuallyElite is actively working to address these problems so I think we should give them a chance to work on it. I admit I was somewhat careless with the source review but it had improved much since this nomination was started. Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 06:16, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

Comments from Bgsu98 (10/10/25)

I don't care much for some of the comments I've read surrounding this list. "How in God's name...?" Save it. I was one of the reviewers on this FLC and spent a lot of time assisting User:ActuallyElite with the style and prose, because the original text was pretty rough. I believe the quality was greatly improved. I did not do a source check. Anyone is welcome to challenge the accuracy or appropriateness of sources. Maybe dialing back the histrionics and offering reasonable suggestions for improving the article would be a positive step? Bgsu98 (Talk) 14:28, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

List of retired Pacific typhoon names

Notified: Jason Rees, WikiProject Weather

I am nominating this for featured list removal because there's several typhoons that are left unsourced, especially the 2020s typhoons. According to Wikipedia:Featured list criteria, it seems like it fails at Number 3, part b; "Statements are sourced where they appear, and they provide inline citations if they contain any of the four kinds of material absolutely required to have citations." Unless the issue gets fixed, these unsourced claims are seriously hurting the FA status of this article. Hoguert (talk) 00:19, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

@Hoguert: Quick note, you tagged Jason Rees and WikiProject Weather as having been notified, but I don't see that you actually did notify them; please do to increase the chance that this list gets fixed. --PresN 12:02, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

I am aware of this FLC having seen it on my watchlist and will see what I can do in the coming days to bring it up to scratch.Jason Rees (talk) 16:37, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

Update: I have done a lot of weeding on the List of retired Philippine typhoon names and this list today and am pleased to report that the death/damage totals from the 2020s are all sourced/referenced, while all retired names and intensity information is sourced. On the overall list in particular, the damage totals will need further work to incorporate death/damage totals from outside of the Philippines, but that's a job for another night.Jason Rees (talk) 02:14, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

I will withdraw from this after the issues are addressed, and so far, you're doing a good job fixing the problems. Hoguert (talk) 00:15, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Update - Over the last week or so, I have done more and more weeding on the Philippine list and now have all the Philippine death/damage totals from Reming (Durian) in 2006 sourced back to the NCDC. Some of these death/damage totals have already been incorporated into the overall article, while I plan on getting them into the main overall article over the next few days.Jason Rees (talk) 10:26, 3 October 2025 (UTC)

"The name Amuyao was meant to replace Malakas, but because PAGASA selected the name to replace Aghon, which was stricken off the naming list of 2024 as a local name, the name was then replaced by Amuyag." Still unsourced. Roy, Mireille, Rananim, Xangsane, Durian are unsourced. There are typhoons in the 1990s, 2000s, and Linfa in 2020 that don't have damage/death toll estimates Hoguert (talk) 11:00, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

@Hoguert: Patience is a virtue since as a part of the FLC, I am trying to ensure that all death/damage totals presented are sourced, accurate and do not include economic losses.Jason Rees (talk) 11:29, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Update: I currently feel like I have brought the majority of the death/damage totals to a point where they are sourced, verifiable and more or less correct. Over the next few days, I will be going over the naming history to ensure it is correct.Jason Rees (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Okay, I was about to pull back from my FLC until I realize there's some duplication source issues with the article, specific sources 4, 78 and 59, 60 GrenadinesDes (talk) 02:23, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

@GrenadinesDes: I have fixed the duplication issue with 69 and 60, 4 and 78 were already fixed, could you withdraw this now? User:Easternsahara_{review this} 01:09, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

@Easternsahara @Jason Rees There's still some areas of unsourced, including "At the 46th session of the Typhoon Committee, it was noted the name Vicente appears on both the tropical cyclone name lists for the Western North Pacific and Eastern North Pacific. In response to this duplication the name Lan was chosen as replacement for Vicente on the Western North Pacific name list to avoid potential confusion." paragraph and Roy's section in pre 2000s. Once those are addressed ill withdraw GrenadinesDes (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2025 (UTC)