3
$\begingroup$

Suppose $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ is a probability space and $(U, \mathcal{\Sigma})$ is a measurable space. There seem to be two ways of defining the conditional expectation of a r.v. $X: \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ given another r.v. $Y: \Omega \rightarrow U$, denoted as $E(X\vert Y)$:

  1. As a $\sigma(Y)$-measurable mapping from $\Omega$ to $\mathbb{R}$, defined as: $$E(X\vert Y) = E(X \vert \sigma(Y)). $$ where $\sigma(Y)$ is the sigma algebra of r.v. $Y$, which I think is also denoted as $Y^{-1}(\mathcal{\Sigma})$?
  2. As a $\mathcal{\Sigma}$-measurable mapping from $U$ to $\mathbb{R}$, defined as follows (from Wikipedia):

    Define measure Q on U to be the probability measure induced by $Y$ on $(U, \mathcal{\Sigma})$, as $Q(B) = P(Y^{−1}(B)), \forall B \in \mathcal{\Sigma}$.

    Define $E(X \vert Y)$ to be the integrable function $g:U \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ such that

    $$ \int_{Y^{-1}(B)} X(\omega) \ d \operatorname{P} = \int_{B} g(u) \ d \operatorname{Q}, \forall B \in \mathcal{\Sigma}.$$

    If I am correct, this definition is related to the first one as: $$E(X \mid Y) \circ Y= E\left(X \mid Y^{-1} \left(\Sigma\right)\right). $$

I was wondering which of the above two is the definition of $E(X \mid Y)$?

Thanks and regards! References (links or books) will also be appreciated!

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ How do you define $E(X|\sigma(Y))$? If it is the usual way, the random variable which satisfies $EX1_A=E[E(X|\sigma(Y)1_A]$ for $A\in\sigma(Y)$ and $1_A$ set indicator function, then two definitions are identical. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2011 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ @mpiktas: For the definition, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_expectation#Formal_definition . Could you show me why they are are identical please? $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2011 at 15:27
  • $\begingroup$ $g$ is the measurable mapping from $(U,\Sigma)$ to $\mathbb{R}$, which means that it is a random variable, only its domain is a probability space $(U,\Sigma,P\circ Y^{-1})$. Since the measure on this probability space is induced by $Y$, distributional properties of $g$ and $E(X|\sigma(Y))$ will be the same. So strictly speaking these definitions define two different mathematical objects, but they have similar properties. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2011 at 15:36

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

I've only seen $E[X|Y]$ used to denote the first one. The second is a function $g$ such that $g(Y) = E[X|\sigma(Y)]$. (by the way, $g$ is only unique up to $Q$-null sets). Informally, you might write $g(y) = E[X|Y=y]$, which is actually correct when $Y$ is discrete (i.e. when $Q$ is atomic).

By definition, $E[X|\sigma(Y)]$ is a $\sigma(Y)$-measurable random variable that is supposed to answer the following: if I told you the value of $Y$, what would be your best estimate of the value of $X$? Your estimate would be different depending on the value of $Y$, so it should be some function $g$ of $Y$. Your second definition is referring to that function $g$.

If you want to prove that in the discrete case $g(y) = E[X|Y=y]$, call the right side $h(y)$. Then show that the random variable $h(Y)$ satisfies the conditions that uniquely define $E[X|\sigma(Y)]$: namely, $h(Y)$ is $\sigma(Y)$-measurable and for any $A \in \sigma(Y)$, $E[h(Y);A] = E[X;A]$. Note that in the discrete case, $A$ is necessarily a countable union of events of the form $\{Y=y_i\}$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I was wondering what kinds of situation/applications one will use the first one, and what kinds of situation/applications one will use the second one? References (links or books) will also be appreciated! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2011 at 6:57
  • $\begingroup$ I was wondering (1) why "The second is a function g such that g(Y)=E[X|Y]"? By the second definition, E[X|Y] is a mapping$: U \times \mathcal{F} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, and how can it be a function of r.v. Y? (2) How to show "g(y)=E[X|Y=y], which is actually correct when Y is discrete (i.e. when Q is atomic)"? Any reference? Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2011 at 9:42
  • $\begingroup$ (1) I meant $E[X|Y]$ in sense 1. I've clarified. (2) I added a hint. I don't have any references for you offhand, sorry. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 25, 2011 at 14:02

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.