User talk:Urvadridge

Welcome!

Hello, Urvadridge, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Davidindia (talk) 11:18, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop trying to correct grammar

Hello, thanks for your efforts here, but please stop trying to correct grammar; many of your edits are damaging articles. Out of the 25 edits you made today, nine have been completely undone and several more have needed modification; this is not acceptable for someone trying to correct grammar. This sort of thing should only be done by native speakers of English, and your addition of a comma in this edit to Cat Fugue proves that your English is not good enough for the sort of edits you're trying to make. Also, your use of the word article in edit summaries is confusing; on Wikipedia, the word "article" normally refers to individual pages about topics, not grammatical articles like "a" and "the". Instead of your current pattern of making unhelppful grmmatical edits to random articles, it'd be better to find something that you're interested in and edit about that . If you need help on Wikipedia, see the links in the welcome message above. Graham87 (talk) 16:13, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've evaluated all your edits, and after doing so, I feel the need to emphasise that you need to stop grammar-checking; you'd be much better off doing anything besides that. There's almost certainly a Wikipedia in another language you know besides English (see the list of Wikipedias); the non-English Wikipedias need all the help they can get. Graham87 (talk) 19:51, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for letting me know about the mistakes. I will try to do the edits of my interest and will focus on things other than grammatical mistakes. Urvadridge (talk) 22:22, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Except you haven't done so; every single edit you've done since then has been an attempted grammatical fix, sometimes successful, sometimes not (such as at Greta Bradman]], Byron Lee, Baron Monteagle of Brandon, and Diderik Hegermann). Your actions so far don't inspire much trust; the only way you've responded to my message above is to make your edit summaries clearer (like this edit at Gavin Price-Jones) which I appreciate). What is your ultimate aim here? If you continue your current editing pattern, you may be blocked. Graham87 (talk) 06:17, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, since you have told me to not to do grammatical fix, the edits I have been doing are about the articles or the preposition. Such as the last 8 to 10 edits I have done. If there is still any issue do let me know. Urvadridge (talk) 08:51, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Definite/indefinite articles and prepositions are also elements of English grammar (see the linked article); you should not try to fix those (and indeed all the edits you've made since your latest comment have either been mostly or fully undone). Every single edit you've made with your account besides the edits to your talk page has involved attempts to fix grammar; that you didn't realise this is yet another reason why you should never try to make such edits again. Why are you trying to make so many edits here? Again, what is your ultimate aim here? Please answer this question; it's very important. Graham87 (talk) 10:00, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Urvadridge, please just stop. "For" can be repeated but doesn't need to: it's a matter of style, and adding an unnecessary word is verbose. This first "the" is maybe okay, but the last three are just wrong because they add an unwarranted definiteness to the terms. "As" is not necessary, and the "a"s are a matter of style. Until you have a better feeling for these things, both in terms of style and in terms of grammatical necessity and correctness, please just stop. Drmies (talk) 14:23, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly word...

Hi Urvadridge (talk), I have been following your edits since I put out that Welcome note. I feel you should create a proper account and User page as they have their own benefits. It is not necessary though. Check this: Wikipedia:Why create an account? I am also not sure how you are selecting your articles to edit. There are many more things you can do than just checking the grammar. Initially I was taken aback by the strong words by Graham87, but I realised after checking his 'reverts' that most of your edits are either not necessary or wrong. Despite many warnings you have been doing the same mistakes. I have counted more than 60 reverts out of your nearly 150 edits. In less than 10 days, that is a huge amount. In the long run this will badly affect your edit history. Also, if you continue in the same vein, there is a danger of your username getting blocked. There are so many articles which need cleanup, for example Indian politician bios... go to any state's election page and you can start cleaning them up. Just an example... But clearly you need to do something else. Hope you understand. Happy editing! Davidindia (talk) 20:20, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidindia: Thanks for this; I know my wording above was strident but I wanted to be clear about my message. I suspect this user is finding articles to edit using the random article feature. Urvadridge, you do have a proper account, but you don't have a user page where you can provide information about yourself and your interests so the Wikipedia community can get to know you better; see the guideline about user pages for more information about that. Graham87 (talk) 03:32, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Xentra ERP Software GmbH for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xentra ERP Software GmbH is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xentra ERP Software GmbH until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Graham87 (talk) 15:00, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, Urvadridge. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Xentra ERP Software GmbH, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Graham87 (talk) 16:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Verkehrsverbund Bremen/Niedersachsen moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Verkehrsverbund Bremen/Niedersachsen. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:50, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, Urvadridge. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page WeWork India, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Graham87 (talk) 16:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WeWork India moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to WeWork India. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Graham87 (talk) 01:22, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For an unblock to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:02, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.