0
$\begingroup$

Given two random variables, both continuous, $X$ and $Y$, we know that $P(X=x)=P(Y=y)=0$. Is it an abuse of notation or is it correct to have the following?

$$P(X<u | Y=y) > 0$$

In particular, can we claim the following?

$$P(X<u | Y=y) = \frac{P(X<u, Y=y)}{P(Y=y)}$$

We have \begin{align} F_X(u) = P(X< u) &= \int_{y=-\infty}^{\infty} \quad \int_{x=-\infty}^u f(x,y) dx \quad dy \\ &= \int_{y=-\infty}^{\infty} \quad \frac{ P( X < u, y < Y < y+dy)}{dy} \quad dy \\ &= \int_{y=-\infty}^{\infty} \quad { P( X < u| y < Y < y+dy)} f_Y(y)dy{} \\ \end{align}

In the expression above, it looks like we can claim the following

$$P(X<u | Y=y) = P(X<u | y < Y < y +dy)$$

however, in the left hand side we do not have $dy$ and in the right hand side we do?

What about the following?

$$P(X<u | Y=y) = \frac{P(X<u, y < Y < y+dy)}{P(y < Y < y+dy)} =\frac{\int_{x=-\infty}^u f_{X,Y}(x,y)dxdy}{f_Y(y) dy} $$

Is the best to say

$$P(X<u | Y=y) = \lim_{\Delta y \rightarrow 0} \frac{P(X<u, y < Y < y+ \Delta y)}{P(y < Y < y+ \Delta y)} $$

or

$$P(X<u | Y=y) = \lim_{\Delta y \rightarrow dy} \frac{P(X<u, y < Y < y+ \Delta y)}{P(y < Y < y+ \Delta y)} $$

?

Here is a related question:

How to formalize "conditional random variables"

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ Are they discrete or continuous random variables? It looks like you are taking them to be discrete so that $P(\{X=x\})$ and $P(\{Y=y\})$ are non-zero. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 30, 2020 at 18:17
  • $\begingroup$ all continuous ... updating accordingly $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 30, 2020 at 18:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It has to do with a notion of conditional expectation. We define then conditional probability in a way $\mathbb P(X \in A | \mathcal G) = \mathbb E[1_A | \mathcal G]$ (it's a random variable), where $\mathcal G$ is some $\sigma-$field. Now it can be shown that for $\mathbb E[X|Y] := \mathbb E[X|\sigma(Y)]$ there exists $\phi$ borel such thath $\mathbb E[X|Y] = \phi(Y)$. Then, you would get some $\phi$ such that $\mathbb P(X \le u | Y) = \phi(Y)$. And one can then understand $" \mathbb P(X \le u | Y=y)"$ to be the value $\phi(y)$ $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 30, 2020 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielS. Are you familiar with basic notions from probability theory such as sample spaces and $\sigma$-algebras? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 30, 2020 at 18:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In this case try the following statlect.com/fundamentals-of-probability/… . It is fairly simple and provides you with a remedy for defining $P(A|B)$ when $P(B)=0$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 30, 2020 at 18:28

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.